NFL linebacker Edwin Jackson allegedly MURDERED by illegal alien driving DRUNK

(National SentinelSenseless: A budding young linebacker for the Indianapolis Colts and his Uber driver were both allegedly mowed down and killed by an illegal alien who had been deported from the country twice.

According to various reports, the driver of the car, 54-year-old Jeffrey Monroe, and his passenger, 26-year-old Colts Linebacker Edwin Jackson, were both killed. Police arrested a man who identified himself as Alex Cabrera Gonsales, a 37-year-old Mexican national after he allegedly crashed his black Ford F-150 into a car parked along Interstate 70 near Indianapolis.

Reports further noted that in reality, the suspect’s name is Manuel Orrego-Savala, a citizen of Guatemala. Records show he was deported once in 2007 and again in 2009. It’s unclear how long he’s been in the country this time.

Authorities believe Monroe was a rideshare operator who picked up Jackson and was taking him home. Monroe apparently pulled his car over to the shoulder to assist Jackson who had become ill.

Both were killed shortly thereafter when Savala allegedly smashed into their vehicle with his pickup truck.

The impact threw one of the victims into the center lane of the highway where he was later struck by another vehicle. The coroner’s office pronounced both victims dead at the scene of the crash.

Savala fled the scene on foot after the crash. Police spotted him a short while later on an interstate off-ramp and arrested him.

Jackson, nicknamed “Pound Cake,” recently completed his second season with the Colts. His death and the death Monroe come as Congress races to beat a March 5 deadline to pass legislation regarding so-called “Dreamers” brought into the U.S. illegally by their parents as children.

Trump is considering allowing them to stay but wants tougher border security including funding for his long-sought border wall, an end to chain migration, and changes to the visa lottery system — all of which Democrats and some Republicans oppose.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

SECOND source confirms: Rosenstein THREATENED House Intel chair Nunes and entire GOP side of committee

(National SentinelConfirmation:Fox News legal analyst who claimed Friday night that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein threatened House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes and other Republicans on the panel now says a second source is confirming it.

The threat was allegedly tied to the Intelligence Committee’s then-plans to release the scandalous FISA memo, which revealed serial abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by upper echelon officials in the FBI and Justice Department to prevent Donald J. Trump from becoming president, and to undermine him after he defeated Hillary Clinton in November 2016. The memo says the officials used a bogus “Trump dossier” — a political document — and represented it before the FISA court as legitimate intelligence to get a surveillance warrant so the Obama administration could spy on a Trump campaign official, Carter Page.

The surveillance was reauthorized at least twice; all three authorizations involved use of the bogus dossier, which was paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the campaign of Hillary Clinton.

Earlier Saturday The National Sentinel reported that legal analyst Gregg Jarrett told Sean Hannity during the latter’s program last night:

I can tell you a congressional source tells me that Rod Rosenstein in a meeting three weeks ago threatened Chairman Nunes and members of Congress he was going to subpoena their texts and messages because he was tired of dealing with the intel committee.

On Saturday, Garrett tweeted out confirmation of that, adding that a second source has also come forward to corroborate his initial source.

“A 2nd source has now confirmed to me that, in a meeting on January 10, Deputy A-G Rosenstein used the power of his office to threaten to subpoena the calls & texts of the Intel Committee to get it to stop it’s [sic] investigation of DOJ and FBI. Likely an Abuse of Power & Obstruction,” Garrett tweeted.

In addition, Jarrett also named the crime Rosenstein may have committed.

“It is a crime for a government official to use his office to threaten anyone, including a member of Congress, for exercising a constitutionally protected right. See 18 USC 242 and other similar abuse of power statutes.”

He added: “Again, if true, Rosenstein’s action was an illegal abuse of power and he should no longer serve as Deputy Attorney General. He allegedly used threats to try to stop the Intelligence Committee from exposing wrongful behavior in an attempt to cover it up.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

It BEGINS: GOP lawmaker calls for Comey, McCabe, others TIED to FISA memo abuse to be JAILED for ‘FISA court fraud’

(National SentinelConspiracy: A Republican lawmaker is calling for former and current ranking FBI and Justice Department officials to be indicted for their role in committing “fraud” against the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court following the release of the FISA Memo.

U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, a former judge himself, said that former FBI Director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, Justice Department official Bruce Ohr should face prison for using what they knew to be a political document — the notorious “Trump dossier” — in order to secure a FISC warrant to allow the bureau to spy on the Trump campaign.

As reported by The Daily Caller:

A FISA court judge has grounds to hold Department of Justice officials including Bruce Ohr in contempt of court for making misrepresentations about the sources of information used to obtain a surveillance warrant against a Trump associate, a former judge and Republican congressman said.

“I think it’s important to know who the FISA judge was, and why with all the info he’s had for some time, he has not put anyone in jail for committing fraud on his court,” Gohmert, who serves on the Committee on the Judiciary, told the news site.

“You shouldn’t be able to get quotes from Bruce Ohr or [former FBI Director Jim] Comey or [deputy director Andrew] McCabe because they ought to be sitting in jail for committing fraud upon the court,” he said.

The FISA memo was released at noon on Friday, revealing serial abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by upper echelon officials in the FBI and Justice Department to prevent Donald J. Trump from becoming president, and to undermine him after he defeated Hillary Clinton in November 2016.

Per Fox News, as many suspected, the discredited and unverified “Trump dossier” was used not once but on three separate occasions to secure a FISA court surveillance warrant to allow the Obama administration to spy on Team Trump during his campaign.

In addition, Hillary Clinton, U.S. media outlets, and ranking officials within DOJ and FBI including former FBI Director James Comey, former deputy director Andrew McCabe, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein were all aware that the dossier was a political document, not a serious piece of intelligence work, the memo explains.

As Fox News reported further, the four-page memo [which you can read here] also “includes testimony from a high-ranking government official who says without the infamous Trump dossier, the FBI and DOJ would not have secured surveillance warrants to spy on at least one member of the Trump team.”

The dossier was commissioned by opposition research firm Fusion GPS, who hired former British spy Christopher Steele to compile it. The dossier was paid for in large part by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Ohr’s wife went to work for Fusion as the dossier was being compiled and disseminated throughout the Washington media.

The memo said “Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the” court when it was used to obtain a surveillance warrant.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who criticized the memo’s release, also gave a copy of it to the FBI.

Gohmert said that the FISA court judge shouldn’t find any of this acceptable.

“This was an action by the DNC and known collusion with top officials at the DOJ and FBI to commit a fraud upon the FISA court,” he added.

But he also noted that the FISA court judge’s own actions ought to be examined more closely.

“The judge has to have known for months now that he or she had a fraud committed against them and he or she has done nothing,” he said.

“Any judge worth any salt would have called them in for hearings, and he can even order anyone who committed fraud upon the court to go to jail. This judge is either worthless or is in cahoots with those who manipulated it.”

While attorneys can be sanctioned by bar associations for fraud upon the court, judges can also hold attorneys in contempt of court for such violations, said Gohmert.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

2ND ‘person of interest’ was sought in LAS VEGAS shooting case; criminal investigation ONGOING

(National SentinelMass Murder: A second “person of interest” was sought by authorities in connection with the Oct. 1 mass shooting in Las Vegas, according to newly released search warrant records.

As reported by the Las Vegas Review-Journal, which — along with other media outlets — sought the release of some 300 court documents, the papers show for the first time that police and FBI investigators sought to question another suspect in the horrific murders.

“Until the investigation can rule otherwise, Marilou Danley and Douglas Haig have become persons of interest who may have conspired with Stephen Paddock to commit Murder with a Deadly Weapon,” according to the Metropolitan Police Department document, which was prepared in October.

Danley was the girlfriend of primary shooting suspect Stephen Paddock and was initially sought as a suspect in the case. She has since been ruled out by authorities as being connected with the shootings, which took place on the 32 floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel and Casino.

Haig, however, has not previously been revealed as a suspect. The LVRJ said he could not be reached for comment.

The paper contacted Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo by phone on Tuesday to comment on Haig. However, he only said, “If you’ve got it, publish it.” He said he could not comment on a federal case.

FBI officials also did not comment.

During a Jan. 20 press briefing, Lombardo said authorities the FBI had an open investigation into a person of interest, though he said repeatedly that Paddock was the only shooter. He also said he doesn’t expect any charges to be filed against Danley.

“I know and believe there was only one suspect who killed 58 people and injured hundreds more,” Lombardo said. “All the evidence recovered in this case supports that theory. There was one shooter in the 1 October massacre. There was only one person responsible, and that was Stephen Paddock.”

The paper reported that Paddock’s brother, Eric Paddock, said he’d never heard of Haig.

“Authorities in Las Vegas have said that while Stephen Paddock acted alone in killing 58 people at the music festival before killing himself in his Mandalay Bay suite, possible criminal charges are still being investigated,” the LVRJ reported.

Update: [12:32 p.m. CST] Haig broke his silence and gave an interview to the UK’s Daily Mail, in which he said he only met Paddock once to sell him tracer ammunition, which Paddock used in his mass shooting. “He showed up. He told me exactly what he wanted. I handed him a box with the ammunition in it. He paid me and he left,” he said.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Former federal prosecutor details Obama’s ‘BRAZEN PLOT’ to exonerate Hillary Clinton and ‘FRAME’ Donald Trump (Video)

(National SentinelObamagate: A former federal prosecutor said in an interview it is beginning to look a lot like the Obama administration launched a plot to ensure that Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton would not only win the 2016 election, but frame then-GOP nominee Donald J. Trump for a crime in the process.

In an interview with The Daily Caller, Joseph DiGenova lays out in detail what he believes the Obama administration did, based on a slew of reports over the past few months that appear to show a distinct pattern of abuse within the FBI, the Department of Justice, and elements of the intelligence community.

He noted that former Obama administration Justice Department and FBI officials may have “violated the law, perhaps committed crimes” to politicize law enforcement and surveillance against political opponents.

He said then-FBI Director James Comey conducted a phony criminal investigation of  Clinton’s mishandling of classified materials as they “followed none of the regular rules, gave her every break in the book, immunized all kinds of people, allowed the destruction of evidence, with no grand jury, no subpoenas, no search warrants. That’s not an investigation. That’s a Potemkin village. It’s a farce.”

The former federal prosecutor also lashed out at the FBI for apparently working with Fusion GPS, a Democrat-aligned opposition research firm, to produce the infamous “Trump dossier” using a former British spy who was in contact with Russian government operatives.

The dossier was paid for in large part by the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party.

DiGenova said that without a justifiable law enforcement or national security reason, he says, the FBI “created false facts so that they could get surveillance warrants. Those are all crimes.”

And he said that by using official FISA-702 “queries,” surveillance was done “to create a false case against a candidate, and then a president.”

During the interview, DiGenova held up an unreported April 2017 99-page FISA court opinion that “describes systematic and on-going violations of the law [by the FBI and their contractors using unauthorized disclosures of raw intelligence on Americans]. This is stunning stuff.”

He added that he believes Fusion GPS and Crowdstrike, the DNC’s private security firm, were among the redacted contractors of the FBI.

“People that were senior career civil servants violated the law, perhaps committed crimes, and covered up crimes by a Presidential candidate [Hillary].  But more than that, they tried to frame an incoming President with a false Russian conspiracy that never existed and they knew it and they plotted to ruin him as a candidate and then destroy him as a President,” DiGenova said.

“That’s why this is important.  That’s why connecting the dots is important, because the FBI now has to be completely reconstructed from the ground up.”

Watch:

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Trump supporter nearly KILLED by Antifa terrorist outside NYC venue: Where’s the MEDIA?

(National SentinelAlt-Left: In an attack that left many shocked and outraged Saturday night, a supporter of President Donald J. Trump was attacked and nearly strangled to death by an Antifa domestic terrorist.

The unidentified victim, reportedly a 56-year-old white male, was attending a ticketed nightclub party called a Night for Freedom that was organized by investigative journalist Mike Cernovich, to commemorate the one-year anniversary of Trump’s presidency.

The victim had left the venue and gotten about a block away from Antifa protestors gathered outside when one of them, David Campbell, 30, of Crown Heights, peeled off from the group to follow the victim.

A witness told police that Campbell punched the victim in the head, which caused him to fall and hit his head on the curb. Campbell then reportedly started strangling the man.

The Gateway Pundit reported that the victim was nearly pulseless and required CPR when emergency medical crews arrive. The report said the victim regained consciousness in the ambulance that took him to an area hospital.

Two other people were reported injured in the attack and were also taken to hospitals, the report said.

The Gateway Pundit noted that the major establishment media have ignored the attack. Only a few outlets including theirs, BreitbartNew York Post, New York Daily News, WCBS-TV and now ours have picked up the story.

During the Obama administration, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security designated Antifa as a domestic terrorist group.

Members of Antifa — which stands for “anti-fascism” — have been involved in several series incidents of violence directed primarily at supporters of the president.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

MASSIVE: The bogus ‘Trump dossier’ funded by Hillary’s campaign WAS used to obtain fraudulent FISA warrant to SPY on TEAM TRUMP

(National SentinelPoliticized: Members of the Obama Justice Department and FBI enforcement apparatus used a 35-page opposition research document paid for in part by Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to obtain a counterintelligence surveillance warrant so they could spy on President Donald J. Trump’s campaign.

The so-called “Trump dossier,” commissioned by Washington, D.C.-based firm Fusion GPS and also paid for in part by the Democratic National Committee, contained highly charged allegations of Team Trump “collusion” with the Russian government during the election, but have yet to be publicly verified by the FBI or Justice Department — meaning use of the document to obtain a warrant from the secretive FISA court was done so under false pretenses.

As reported exclusively by investigative correspondent Sara Carter of Circa News, “The unverified dossier alleging connections between President Trump’s campaign and the Russians was used as evidence by the FBI to gain approval from a secret court to monitor members of Trump’s team.”

Much of the so-called ‘evidence’ contained in the dossier was gathered by former British spy Christopher Steele has either been discounted outright or is still unsubstantiated.

Nevertheless, Carter reported, the FBI under Obama “gained approval…to surveil members of Trump’s campaign and ‘it’s outrageous and clearly should be thoroughly investigated,’ said a senior law enforcement source, with knowledge of the process.”

Carter said multiple sources told her that the dossier was used, along with other evidence, to obtain the warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or FISC.

Sources also stressed to her that in the coming week more information regarding systemic “FISA abuse” will be forthcoming.

Federal judges who serve on the FISA court meet in secret. They serve single seven year terms and do not have to have any particular knowledge of the U.S. Intelligence Community or intelligence functions. Their only ‘client’ is the U.S. government. They seldom turn down government agency requests for counterintelligence surveillance warrants because they don’t want to be seen as impediments to legitimate intelligence collection.

“(The dossier) certainly played a role in obtaining the warrant,” added another senior U.S. official, with knowledge of the dossier. “Congress needs to look at the FBI officials who were handling this case and see what, if anything, was verified in the dossier. I think an important question is whether the FBI payed anything to the source for the dossier.”

Carter said that on Wednesday, Fox News host Sean Hannity said that he has also independently verified that the dossier was improperly used to obtain the FISA surveillance warrant from three separate sources.

On Monday, The Daily Caller reported that the House Intelligence Committee had finally received all of the documents it subpoenaed last August pertaining to the Trump dossier from the FBI and Department of Justice.

In October, the Washington Post reported that Clinton and the DNC paid for a large portion of the dossier, which was initially opposition research but somewhere along the way became an ‘intelligence document.’

Fred Fleitz, vice president for Policy and Programs told One America News Network‘s Liz Wheeler in November that the dossier was something other than what has been portrayed.

“This was a foreign intelligence officer paid by the Democrats to work with the Russians to prepare a dossier to smear a presidential candidate from the other party,” he said, in reference to Steele.

“This is not ‘opposition research,’ and if they somehow got the FBI involved into investigating members of the other party…Liz, think what would have happened if Trump had did this,” Fleitz said.

Some have said if the FBI relied on the phony dossier to obtain a FISA warrant, that could have negative implications for special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Trump-Russia collusion.

In July last year, the Washington Times reported that some Democrats widely circulated the dossier on Capitol Hill.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Judge dismisses ALL charges against rancher Cliven Bundy, three others, citing ‘FLAGRANT MISCONDUCT’ by federal prosecution

(National SentinelJustice Served: A federal judge has dismissed all charges against Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and three others after citing “flagrant prosecutorial misconduct” in the case.

U.S. District Judge Gloria Navarro had previously declared a mistrial in the high-profile case on Dec. 20, Fox News reported, adding:

It was only the latest, stunning development in the saga of the Nevada rancher, and served as a repudiation of the federal government. Navarro accused prosecutors of willfully withholding evidence from Bundy’s lawyers, in violation of the federal Brady rule.

The rule, named after the landmark 1963 Supreme Court case known as Brady v. Maryland, holds that evidence withheld from a defendant amounts to a violation of the right to due process.

“In this case the failures to comply with Brady were exquisite, extraordinary,” said Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano. “The judge exercised tremendous patience.”

“Either the government lied or [it’s actions were] so grossly negligent as to be tantamount to lying,” Napolitano said. “This happened over and over again.”

The case stemmed from a standoff between Bundy and federal agents from the Bureau of Land Management in 2014. However, tensions between the Bundy operation and the federal government began long before that.

In 1990, in an effort to protect the desert tortoise, the federal government moved to limit grazing rights on federal land in Nevada, encompassing ground that Bundy had utilized for decades.

In 1993 he refused to renew his grazing rights, claiming the BLM and the federal government had no sovereignty over the state of Nevada.

Federal courts subsequently sided with the government. However, for the next 20 years Bundy and government agencies butted heads, during which time he racked up $1 million in owed grazing fees and fines.

The disagreement came to a head in 2014 when heavily-armed BLM agents moved in to confiscate Bundy’s cattle grazing on government property. A stand-off ensued as scores of armed civilians showed up to counter BLM agents and local authorities.

Eventually authorities stood down, fearing the public’s safety, and pledged to return Lundy’s cattle. Bundy continued to graze his cattle, and he and sons Ammon and Ryan were eventually arrested.

The were charged with numerous felonies, including conspiracy, assault on a federal officer and using a firearm in a violent crime, and faced many years in prison.

The case began in late October, 2017. However, within two months it fell apart, with Navarro angrily denouncing the prosecution.

She had already once threatened a mistrial after prosecutors released thousands of pages of documents to the defense late. In all, the government was late in handing over more than 3,300 pages of documents.

Furthermore, some defense requests for information were ridiculed by prosecutors as “fantastical” and a “fishing expedition.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Grassley: James Comey may have LEAKED CLASSIFED memo to friend

(National SentinelIllegal: The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said in a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Wednesday that former FBI Directory James Comey may have illegally leaked a classified memo to a friend.

In his letter, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, demanded answers from Rosenstein regarding the handling of memos that Comey wrote following his conversations with President Donald J. Trump, The Daily Caller reported.

The Judiciary chairman said that he and his staff have recently reviewed seven memos Comey wrote following his meetings with the president. Of those, four contained information that was classified as “Secret” or “Confidential.”

Grassley also noted that past media reports claimed that Comey gave at least four memos to his friend, Columbia law professor Daniel Richman.

During congressional testimony last year, Comey told a House panel he hoped that leaking the memos would lead to a special counsel appointment aimed at investigating Trump’s campaign. Shortly thereafter, Rosenstein appointed former FBI director and Comey friend Robert Mueller.

A report in July 2017 said that more than half of the memos Comey wrote following his Trump meetings contained classified information.

“This revelation raises the possibility that Comey broke his own agency’s rules and ignored the same security protocol that he publicly criticized Hillary Clinton for in the waning days of the 2016 presidential election,” The Hill reported.

The paper also noted that Comey testified the previous month before the House Intelligence Committee that he shared at least one of them with Richman. “He asked that lawyer to leak information from one memo to the news media in hopes of increasing pressure to get a special prosecutor named in the Russia case after Comey was fired as FBI director,” The Hill noted further.

“If it’s true that Professor Richman had four of the seven memos, then in light of the fact that four of the seven memos the Committee reviewed are classified, it would appear that at least one memo the former FBI director gave Professor Richman contained classified information,” Grassley writes.

He asserted in his letter that the Justice Department and FBI have so far failed to provide crucial details about the memos and how they were handled.

Grassley said during a recent review of the memos that was held in a secure facility, FBI personnel “refused” to answer questions about the chain of custody of the memos, when they were deemed classified, and who made the classified determinations.

The Daily Caller reported further:

In his letter, Grassley asked Rosenstein to clarify whether the DOJ or FBI have determined whether any of the memos that Comey sent to Richman contained classified information and which of the seven Comey memos had been provided to Richman.

Grassley is also inquiring when Richman received the memos and whether any had classification markings on them at the time they were exchanged.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Trump to DOJ: ‘JAIL!’ to Abedin, Comey; Calls on ‘DEEP STATE’ Justice Dept. to ACT

(National SentinelJustice Deserved: President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday slammed “Crooked Hillary” aide Huma Abedin and appeared to call on the “Deep State” Justice Department to act following new revelations she may have mishandled classified emails.

“Crooked Hillary Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, has been accused of disregarding basic security protocols. She put Classified Passwords into the hands of foreign agents. Remember sailors pictures on the submarine? Jail!” Trump tweeted early Tuesday. “Deep State Justice Dept must finally act? Also on Comey & others.”

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/948174033882927104

The president was making a reference to U.S. Navy sailor Kristian Saucier who was jailed after taking unauthorized cell phone photos inside a nuclear submarine. Trump appeared to be suggesting that a double standard was being employed against the sailor and Hillary Clinton, Abedin and others involved in mishandling classified data.

Fox News reported further:

The president’s tweet comes after the State Department, in a Friday news dump, released a batch of emails from Abedin’s account that were discovered by the FBI on a laptop belonging to her estranged husband, Anthony Weiner. At least four of the documents were marked “classified.”

As reported by the UK’s Daily Mail, the group Judicial Watch had filed suit to obtain the documents from the State Department. The group’s president, Tom Fitton, speculated in October that the laptop likely contained classified information.

At least five emails determined to be classified were found among 2,800 documents stored on a laptop belonging to Anthony Weiner, whose then-wife Huma Abedin was deputy chief of staff to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

The State Department released its documents Friday afternoon. They included eight pages that were classified at the “confidential level,” the third-most sensitive level established by the U.S. government.

In addition, Abedin forwarded classified emails to her Yahoo account, reports noted Tuesday. All Yahoo accounts were hacked in 2013 by Russian state actors, according to a CNN/Money report.

Comey exonerated Clinton in July 2016 despite the fact that FBI agents had discovered evidence she mishandled classified information. He reopened the case in late October after agents found classified emails on a laptop belonging to Abedin’s now-estranged husband, former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner.

Comey told lawmakers during a congressional hearing earlier this year that he believed Abedin forwarded emails to Weiner for him to print out so that she could give them to Clinton.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

 

CRIMINAL: Top Hillary Aide Huma Abedin forwarded State Dept. passwords to Yahoo email acct. before it was HACKED by Russians and others

(National SentinelCriminal Negligence: Hillary Clinton’s former top aide at the State Department, Huma Abedin, forwarded government email account passwords to her private unsecured Yahoo account before it was eventually hacked by foreign powers including Russia.

As reported by The Daily Caller‘s Luke Rosiak, an analysis of Abedin’s emails released by the State Department to government watchdog Judicial Watch last week found that Abedin regularly used her personal email provider to conduct sensitive State Department work.

CNN/Money reported in October that all Yahoo email accounts had been hacked in August 2013. Yahoo was also hit by another hack in 2014 believed to be separate from the 2013 hack and thought to have affected 500 million users, the network added.

“This guarantees that an account with high-level correspondence in Clinton’s State Department was impacted by one or more of a series of breaches — at least one of which was perpetrated by a ‘state-sponsored actor,'” Rosiak reported.

U.S. officials later charged Russian intelligence agent Igor Sushchin with hacking the 500 million accounts, he added. The 2014 hack allowed Sushchin and his associated to gain access to accounts in subsequent years — 2015 and 2016 — by using fake cookies.

Sushchin was also employed by Russian investment bank Renaissance Capital, the institution that paid former President Bill Clinton a half-million dollars for a single speech in Moscow in June 2010, when his wife was Obama’s secretary of state.

Abedin, Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at State, regularly forwarded work emails to her personal humamabedin@yahoo.com address, government officials said.

“She would use these accounts if her (State) account was down or if she needed to print an email or document. Abedin further explained that it was difficult to print from the DoS system so she routinely forwarded emails to her non-DoS accounts so she could more easily print,” noted an FBI report.

She sent passwords for her government laptop to her Yahoo account on Aug. 24, 2009, according to an email released by the State Department in September 2017.

Huma sends laptop password to Yahoo / Source: State Department

The Daily Caller noted further:

Long-time Clinton confidante Sid Blumenthal sent Clinton an email in July 2009 with the subject line: “Important. Not for circulation. You only. Sid.” The email began “CONFIDENTIAL… Re: Moscow Summit.” Abedin forwarded the email to her Yahoo address, potentially making it visible to hackers.

That email was deemed by government investigators as too sensitive to release to the public under Freedom of Information Act guidelines, so it was heavily redacted before being turned over to Judicial Watch.

The released copy says “Classified by DAS/ A/GIS, DoS on 10/30/2015 Class: Confidential.” The unredacted portion reads: “I have heard authoritatively from Bill Drozdiak, who is in Berlin…. We should expect that the Germans and Russians will now cut their own separate deals on energy, regional security, etc.”

In March 2009, Clinton forwarded an email to Abedin from Denis McDonough, a foreign policy advisor to Obama’s campaign and later his chief of staff, marked “Ambassadors.” It, too, was heavily redacted before being released to Judicial Watch.

As Abedin continued to use her Yahoo account to conduct sensitive work, media reports noted how poor Yahoo’s email security was. A July 2012 CNN article reported that credentials to 450,000 Yahoo accounts had been posted online. Five days later, Rosiak reported, Abedin forwarded sensitive email to her Yahoo account.

It seems clear that the Justice Department and FBI knew that Abedin and Clinton were essentially trafficking in sensitive materials via unsecured channels, but no charges were ever filed.

Clinton said on Oct. 9, 2016, at the second presidential debate with then-GOP nominee Donald J. Trump, “After a year-long investigation, there is no evidence that anyone hacked the server I was using and there is no evidence that anyone can point to at all, anyone who says otherwise has no basis, that any classified materials ended up in the wrong hands. I take classified materials very seriously and always have.”

But that is not consistent with FBI findings. Abedin’s use of her private Yahoo account fits with the bureau’s assessment that her account, and those of others involved, were indeed compromised.

“We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private email accounts of individuals with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her private account,” then-FBI director Jim Comey  said in 2016.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

 

Expert: James Comey LIED to Congress, as Weiner-Abedin CLASSIFIED emails prove

(National SentinelUnder Oath: Former FBI Director James Comey was not truthful with Congress when he testified earlier this year when he discussed classified emails that bureau investigators found on a laptop in 2016 belonging to former U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner, said Chris Farrell, the Director of Investigations and Research at Judicial Watch.

During an appearance on Fox Business‘ “Lou Dobbs Tonight,” Farrell noted that at least five of the emails turned over to his organization on Friday by the State Department in response to a FOIA lawsuit contained classified information. At the time they were discovered, Weiner was married to Huma Abedin, a top aide to Hillary Clinton when she served as President Obama’s secretary of state.

At the time of the emails, Abedin was married to Weiner, a onetime Democratic congressman who began a 21-month prison sentence last month after being convicted of sexting a 15-year-old girl.

Fox News reported Friday that Comey said during a congressional hearing earlier this year that he believed Abedin regularly forwarded emails to Weiner for him to print out so she could give them to Clinton.

Farrell insisted that Comey’s testimony to Congress was erroneous.

“I know that people have been jailed for a fraction, a tiny fraction, of what has now been made public and documented through Judicial Watch’s litigation and so this really cries out for a legitimate investigation being done,” he told Dobbs.

“Your earlier clip with Mr. Comey talking about intent is a fraud,” he continued. “There’s no requirement for proving intent under that particular citation I gave you a moment ago. Intent is irrelevant. The fact that the loss or the mishandling of the national defense information occurred – that’s the crime.”

He continued, “Frankly, these documents conform the foundation for an indictment of Comey and [Peter] Strzok, the investigator who is at the center of this entire nightmare of a security problem.”

Earlier in the day, Bernard Kerik, New York City’s former police commissioner, tweeted essentially the same thing.

“The possession, transmission, and failing to secure these documents are all federal crimes that do not require intent. Why hasn’t someone been prosecuted? Any member of the , or would’ve been prosecuted in a second for a violation that substantial,” he wrote.

Comey famously claimed in a July 2016 press conference and later to Congress that Clinton had been “extremely careless” in her handling of classified email, which is not a legally actionable term.

The former FBI director had initially written in his statement that her behavior was “grossly negligent,” which is a legally actionable term. However, Strzok later changed that portion of his statement to “extremely careless.”

Critics of the widening classified email scandal say the latest findings among documents released by the State Department indicate that criminal charges not only should have been recommended a year ago, but that they should still be filed.

“This is a major victory,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a Friday statement. “After years of hard work in federal court, Judicial Watch has forced the State Department to finally allow Americans to see these public documents.”

Fitton added, “That these government docs were on Anthony Weiner’s laptop dramatically illustrates the need for the Justice Department to finally do a serious investigation of Hillary Clinton’s and Huma Abedin’s obvious violations of law.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

GHASTLY: Federal agents discover ‘preserved’ fetuses in BODY BROKER’s warehouse (Warning: Graphic Photo)

(National Sentinel) Horror: Federal agents have discovered four preserved fetuses in warehouse in Detroit belonging to a man who dealt in human body parts, Reuters reported.

The fetuses were not found recently, but rather in a 2013 raid of businessman Arthur Rathburn’s warehouse.

Rathburn, a former broker of body parts, has been accused of defrauding customers by sending them body parts that were diseased. He has pleaded not guilty and he is scheduled to stand trial in January.

It wasn’t clear how Rathburn acquired the fetuses or what he intended to do with them. And his lawyers did not respond to requests for comment.

Reuters noted that neither his indictment nor other public documents related to his case mention the fetuses.

Members of Congress were sickened and angry about the discovery of the fetuses.

“This needs to be reviewed,” said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who recently chaired a special U.S. House committee on the use of fetal tissue.

Blackburn recoiled when a Reuters reporter showed her some of the photographs. Federal agents reportedly took the photos.


Photo credit: Reuters

In four of them, a crime scene investigator in a HAZMAT suit used a pair of forceps to lift the fetuses from the brownish liquid.

“The actions depicted in these photos are an insult to human dignity,” said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

He added that if individuals “violate federal laws and traffic in body parts of unborn children for monetary gain,” they should be “held accountable.”

Remarkably, the buying and selling of cadavers and other human body parts is widespread in the U.S. and virtually unregulated. However, trading in fetal tissue is a violation of federal law.

FO-300x250-1

“Photos from inside Rathburn’s warehouse offered a stark example of government failures to police the industry. They include images of rotting human heads, some floating face up in a plastic cooler,” Reuters reported.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

WOW: Fox News’ Tucker Carlson posts ‘Never-Before-Seen’ CRIME STATS for ILLEGAL aliens (Video)

(National SentinelDispelling Myths: On his Thursday night program, Fox News host Tucker Carlson presented what he said were “never-before-seen” statistics indicating that illegal aliens commit far more crimes than previously known.

Carlson began the segment by recounting an argument that Democratic politicians often make in supporting unlimited immigration, legal or illegal, and recounted how liberals claim non-citizens commit less crime than U.S. citizens.

“They are your superiors,” he said, mockingly.

Then Carlson began presenting a list of statistics he said he never been presented to the American public to support his position.

“According to statistics from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, non-citizens are actually far more likely to commit serious crimes than Americans are,” said Carlson.

For instance, he said, “Non-citizens account for 22 percent, more than a fifth of all federal murder convictions.”

Also, they account for “18 percent of fraud convictions” and “33 percent of money laundering convictions,” added Carlson.

Illegal aliens are also responsible for “29 percent of drug trafficking convictions and 72 percent of convictions for drug possession.”

“Meanwhile, the non-citizen percentage of the American people? About 7 percent,” he added.

In summing up the newly released statistics, the Fox News host said this is a “massively disproportionate” amount of crime committed by illegal aliens.

“Why have so many people been lying to us for so long? That’s a question we plan to ask a whole bunch of people,” Carlson said.

Watch:

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

That time when Rosie O’Donnell committed a FELONY

analysis
By J. D. Heyes, editor-in-chief

(National SentinelSlam-Dunk: Poor Rosie O’Donnell. The washed-up ‘comedian’ and actress is so distraught over Republican control of Congress and Donald J. Trump having beaten the most corrupt presidential candidate in the history of the republic (that would be one Hillary Clinton) she has been reduced to behaving like a Mafia figure.

On the eve of the Senate’s vote to support the Trump-led tax reform proposal — the first major reform and reduction of taxes in more than 30 years — O’Donnell took to Twitter to make this Mafioso-type offer: She offered to pay Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and/or Jeff Flake of Arizona $2 million eachif they would just vote “no” on the bill.

Wow. Rosie is just like her Democrat friends and soulmates; they really hate it when Republicans try to let Americans keep more of their own money rather than have it confiscated at gunpoint by the IRS so Democrats can redistribute it to constituents.

As The Daily Caller notes, O’Donnell was very plain and open, writing on Twitter, “so how about this i promise to give 2 million dollars to senator susan collins and 2 million to senator jeff flake.” Later in her tweet, she added, “no s**t 2 million cash each”.

No Republicans took her up on the offer; all 51 voted for the measure. (Related: Rosie O’Donnell’s contribution to treason.)

That said, she probably committed a felony when she made her offer.

So, a little statute called “18 U.S. Code § 201 – Bribery of public officials and witnesses” states:

(a) (1) the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror

Naturally, a senator is a “member of Congress.”

There’s more:

(b)Whoever—

(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—

  1. to influence any official act

Adds USLegal.com:

“The General Federal Bribery Statute punishes the offense of bribery in the U.S[iii].  According to 18 USCS prec § 201(b), whoever directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official with intent to influence that person’s official act will be fined for the offense of bribery.”

That’s pretty much what O’Donnell did with her stupid, ridiculous, ham-handed attempt to “influence” the votes of two sitting U.S. senators. I mean, if I were a prosecutor who was handed this case, the only negotiating I would be doing with O’Donnell’s lawyers is over the amount of time in prison she’d be spending.

Which, according to the statute, can be “a fine of an amount not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, or imprisonment for not more than fifteen years, or both,” according to USLegal.com.

So in other words, in her lunacy, O’Donnell stepped in it big time when she very publicly offered to bribe two sitting U.S. senators. And as such, we are now calling on the Trump Justice Department to do its job and prosecute this very obvious attempt to unduly influence the constitutional processes of our government.

There should be no excuses. Frankly, I’m surprised the president hasn’t picked up the phone to Attorney General Jeff Sessions yet and ‘requested’ this case be pursued, because if what O’Donnell just did doesn’t qualify as attempted bribery, then nothing does.

This story was originally published at NewsTarget.com.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?