STATS: Non-citizens committing disproportionate share of federal CRIMES; NO on DACA

(National Sentinel‘Illegal’ Immigrants: A newly released report from an immigration reform group found that illegal aliens account for an outsized portion of all federal crimes, lending further support to critics of Democrats’ push to legalize DACA recipients.

The Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for a reduction in legal immigration and pushes for assimilation of the current immigrant population in the U.S., said it found that of those convicted of federal crimes between 2011 and 2016, 44.2 percent were not U.S. citizens.

If immigration crimes are excluded, 21 percent of convicts were not U.S. citizens – 2.5 times the non-citizen share of the population, CIS analysts — who relied on U.S. Sentencing Commission data — said.

“These new numbers show that, at least at the federal level, non-citizens are more likely to commit crimes than non-citizens,” Dr. Steven Camarota, the center’s director of research and author of the analysis, said.

“Of course, it is hard to speak unequivocally about immigrant crime in general as states and localities do not systematically track the country of birth, citizenship, or legal status of those they arrest, convict, or incarcerate,” he noted further.

He said that most lawbreaking occurs at the state and local level, and as such, it’s not practical to simply extrapolate generally about illegal immigrant federal crimes.

“Nonetheless, federal law enforcement is still enormous, with 312,000 people (67,000 of them non-citizens, both legal and illegal) sentenced in the federal courts between 2011 and 2016, excluding immigration violations,” he wrote in his analysis.

“And in the federal system, where we do have good data, non-citizens account for a disproportionate share of those who are sentenced for many different types of non-immigration crimes.”

The areas where non-citizens account for a much larger share of convictions than their 8.4 percent share of the adult population include:

  • 42.4 percent of kidnapping convictions;
  • 31.5 percent of drug convictions;
  • 22.9 percent of money laundering convictions;
  • 13.4 percent of administration of justice offenses (e.g. witness tampering, obstruction, and contempt);
  • 17.8 percent of economic crimes (e.g. larceny, embezzlement, and fraud);
  • 13 percent of other convictions (e.g. bribery, civil rights, environmental, and prison offenses); and
  • 12.8 percent of auto thefts.

The report comes as President Donald J. Trump and Congress work on legislation pertaining to the fate of DACA, or Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals, an Obama-era policy initiated by executive order that protected some 700,000-800,000 illegal aliens brought into the country as children by their parents.

Obama implemented the policy in 2012, but Trump rescinded it in September, giving Congress six months to come up with a legislative fix.

A federal court on Tuesday issued a temporary injunction against rescinding the program until lawsuits filed by outside groups in support of keeping it in place work their way through the legal system.

As for the fate of DACA, Trump met with Republican and Democratic leaders at the White House on Tuesday to discuss immigration reform that was open to reporters. Democrats are pushing for a “clean” DACA bill that legalizes those who fall under the policy, with an eventual path to citizenship.

But that clashes with Trump’s campaign pledges, where he promised to deport DACA recipients and all illegal aliens, as well as build a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico.

Conservative pundits reminded the president of his pledges throughout the day, with one — Fox News‘ Tucker Carlson — going so far as to question why Trump ran if he’s not going to push for the immigration reform measures he promised on the campaign trail.

“Amnesty for DACA recipients is the only leverage the White House has. Once the president agrees to let them jump to the head of the line, ahead of millions of other people hoping to come here legally, the negotiation is over,” Carlson said.

“At that point, why would Democrats agree to anything? Ending chain migration, the diversity lottery, supporting a merit based system that might actually help America? No chance.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Reality: Not everyone was covered under Obamacare, either

(NationalSentinel) Healthcare: The Congressional Budget Office has released its awaited assessment of the American Health Care Act, the bill being touted by House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., as the “first phase” of the repeal and replacement of Obamacare. The verdict? Mixed.

As reported by the Washington Examiner, there are some things to love about the assessment and some things not to love:

The Republican plan to repeal and replace Obamacare would result in 14 million more people without health coverage next year but reduce federal spending by $337 billion compared to current law, according to an estimate Monday from Congress’ official scorekeeper.

About 24 million people would lose coverage over the next decade under the American Health Care Act, the Congressional Budget Office said Monday. But the plan would reduce taxes by $883 billion over the next decade.

HHS Secretary Tom Price is panning the CBO assessment as “not believable” and “simply wrong,” but hang on there a minute, Tom. Not everything in this assessment is bad.

What’s good? The fact that Americans will be taxed close to a trillion dollars less than they otherwise would be over the next 10 years under Obamacare. In addition, with the Medicaid subsidies going away, that means less debt will be added to the $20 trillion our kids and grandkids already owe.

And that part about fewer people being covered under the GOP plan? So what? The thing to remember is, despite the grand expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare, some 29 million Americans still aren’t covered under the Affordable Care Act. And remember that was a key promise President Obama and Democrats pushing the ACA made, is that finally, after all these centuries, every single American would have health insurance.

Like our reporting? Sign up for our daily email newsletter and never miss a story! Click here

And that might have actually happened, were it not for the grossly negligent impact Obamacare had on the insurance and health care markets: The dramatic spikes in out-of-pocket costs (deductibles, premiums, etc.) coupled with less actual coverage meant that tens of millions of mostly healthy Americans opted out of buying a plan altogether and instead took the year-end penalty by the IRS because they were thousands of dollars ahead.

Recognizing that the GOP replacement plan also won’t cover all Americans is merely acknowledging reality. And the fact is, truth be told, more Americans are much more interested in dramatic rate decreases, insurance company choice and other savings that the AHCA will bring about; they’re not sitting around fretting about those who, for whatever reason, don’t obtain coverage.

Because that’s been one of the biggest problems of all regarding Obamacare – that it forces Americans to buy a product they might otherwise choose not to buy, and it forces them to do pay inflated prices for a substandard product.

Finally, CBO noted that most of those who would choose not to obtain health insurance coverage under the GOP replacement legislation “would tend to be healthier than those who would not be deterred” – which is precisely what is happening right now under Obamacare.

This analysis isn’t as bad as it may appear on the surface, and frankly Republicans interested in repealing Obamacare ought not be deterred by its findings.