Left-wing HACK journalist tweets college professors should DROWN conservative students

(National SentinelFringe: A Left-wing former contributor to Deadspin gave a harsh response to a conservative activist who tweeted out that conservative students on college campuses are treated unfairly by liberal professors who dominate most institutions.

“I get countless of messages from students who say professors are lowering their grades & penalizing them for being conservative,” Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA tweeted Wednesday. “Leftists dominating higher education represent a grave threat to our country & culture.

“Conservative students shouldn’t be targeted for disagreeing,” he added.

That tweet earned him a now-deleted response from Jesse Farrar, formerly of Deadspin and Vice, who wrote professors should instead “hold the conservative students heads under water until they stop breathing.”

Kirk responded: “I’m sure he is joking, but imagine if conservatives made a joke like that against liberals?”

“I am not joking,” Farrar wrote back, later deleting the tweet.

Kirk told Fox News the response “stunned” him. “He’s calling for the public death of conservative students,” he added. “They disagree with our worldview so much that [liberals] literally want us dead.”

Deadspin was contacted about Farrar’s comment by the Independent Review-Journal, and Deputy Editor Barry Petchesky said that while he didn’t agree with Farrar’s “method,” he said, “I can’t argue that it wouldn’t make the world a better place,” Fox News reported.

“So, mass genocide of conservative students would make the world a better place,” Kirk noted.

J. D. Heyes, editor-in-chief of The National Sentinel, noted that liberal journalists in the U.S. today are actually doing Americans a favor by revealing their true identities.

“In the age of Trump, these bozos are doing a full-reveal and letting us see them for the anti-American shills they’ve always been,” he said. “What’s more, people like this are taking over the Democratic Party, with the party’s blessing.

“Maybe now it’s easier to see why conservatives and Republicans in Congress should stop trying to ‘work with’ these Marxist lunatics who are openly advocating our deaths,” he added. “Imagine how it will be if they ever really do take power.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Campus COMMIE: Lib professor claims meritocracy is WHITE supremacy

(National SentinelAcademia: A while liberal English professor at Linfield College in McMinnville, Oregon, has devised a ‘checklist’ she says is intended to let others know if they are a white supremacist.

In a Friday op-ed for Inside Higher Ed, Professor Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt claimed that following many years of thought and reflection, she “created a list of qualities and attributes of those that overtly or covertly support or contribute to a culture of mundane and everyday white supremacy within our institutions.”

She then proceeded to outline 15 “troubles” that she “identified to help others in academe recognize your (un)conscious contributions to white supremacy,” Campus Reform reported.

The first item on the checklist is working “in a position of power in a predominantly white institution” while doing nothing “to change the white supremacist power structures within your departments, committees and institutional decision-making process.”

The checklist also claims that wanting to nominate “‘stellar’ (mostly men) and obviously ‘white’” colleagues for leadership positions and awards is also a sign of aiding white supremacy, and implicitly supports “a logic of meritocracy that is built on this racist assumption that everyone has had the same access and opportunities.”

“When it comes to understanding your own white privilege, you get very angry if a faculty member of color points out to you where and how your privilege is operating,” another bullet point says. “You deem such critiques as ‘uncivil’ and as not supporting a collegial environment.”

It’s not the first time someone in academia has pushed what are essentially communist ideas. Last fall, Penn State Prof. Angela Putnam wrote in an academic paper that the notion “if I work hard, I can be successful” is merely a product of white ideology.

Emphasizing a collectivist mindset, Putman introduces the notion that Americans are falsely “socialized to believe that we got to where we are… because of our own individual efforts.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

University teaches caucasion employees how to overcome WHITE ‘discomfort’

(National SentinelWhite-Shaming: The University of Michigan has held a two-day professional development conference which included a training session geared towards helping white employees ‘deal’ with their “whiteness” so they are better equipped to fight on behalf of social causes, The College Fix reported.

Participants who attended the “Conversations on Whiteness” session, which was held Dec. 5 during the university’s Student Life Professional Development Conference, were instructed on how to “recognize the difficulties they face when talking about social justice issues related to their White identity, explore this discomfort, and devise ways to work through it,” according to the university’s website.

The goal of the instruction was to assist participants in “unpacking Whiteness” in support of students and staff with issues and efforts “related to identity and social justice,” the website continued.

The session was more than a dozen workshops offered at the professional development conference, The College Fix reported, which was held Dec. 4-5.

The whiteness session utilized the “Privileged Identity Exploration Model” to help white participants explore the “discomfort” of their “white identity,” organizers said.

First introduced in 2007 by University of Iowa professor Sherry Watt in a College Student Affairs Journal article, the model purports to be a method for understanding how people react to stimuli that alert them of the privilege they hold. The model is to be used by “facilitators” to “engage participants in discussions about diversity,” according to Watt.

Watt states there are eight defenses people use to avoid recognizing their privilege. Examples of defenses include “denial,” where someone simply refuses to admit their privilege, and “minimization,” where someone trivializes the impact of their privilege.

The College Fix noted that of three University of Michigan staffers contacted about the session and whether there were racial issues on campus that necessitated it, two did not respond to inquiries and a third, ick Smith, director of campus involvement, said only: “This is an internal training for U-M Student Life staff.”

Another session, titled “I Don’t Feel Safe Talking About Race,” was devoted to giving staff “tools to create a safer climate to promote dialogue around racial issues.” Meanwhile “The Intersection of Well-being, and Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion on Campus” workshop aimed to help Student Life staff “work towards wellness justice for all students on campus.”

The College Fix noted that other universities around the country are also beginning to focus on what critics call “white-shaming.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

‘It’s okay to be white’ sign sparking outrage on college campuses

(National SentinelRacism: Signs declaring that “It’s Okay to be White” adorning walls in universities around the country have sparked widespread backlash and anger, The College Fix reports.

The site reported that some of the signs have also been spotted on college campuses in Canada as well.

The signs were launched via a coordinated 4chan campaign. Users spelled out their “game plan” on the anonymous Internet forum board instructing people to post the signs on campuses to prompt the media to go “completely berserk.”

The ultimate goal was to show what 4chan users called “normies” that “leftists & journalists hate white people,” in turn prompting these middle-of-the-road folks to turn on them in a “massive victory for the right in the culture war.”

In fact, the signs have already done what they were designed to do — gain widening coverage and spark outrage.

But others have begun questioning why saying “it’s okay to be white” should automatically be considered racist.

Colleges such as Harvard, Princeton, Tulane, Western Washington, Auburn, the University of Kansas and Concordia College have had the posters appear on campus. The University of Alberta and the University of Toronto also saw the signs, as did a high school in Maryland. Typically, the signs are removed quickly by university staff when they are found.

Though the signs were meant to troll Left-leaning students, many of them took the bait.

Here’s just one example: “I am deeply disgusted that this organized online campaign to divide university communities across the country has come to our campus. It is shameful that anyone would use these posters to promote a racist agenda,” University of Kansas’ student body president, Mady Womack, told the Kansan.

Here’s another: “The university is aware of several incidents of racism that have occurred on north campus in recent days… Messaging or displays that target or marginalize any individuals or groups will not be tolerated. We are working with University of Alberta Protective Services to find the parties responsible,” President David Turpin said in a statement.

The flyers have been widely denounced as “racist” and “intolerant.”

What are your thoughts?

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Creeping Marxism: One-fifth of all college students support VIOLENCE to shut down opposing speech

(National SentinelInstitutions of Marxism: Left-wing college and university professors and administrators are continuing to successfully transform American students into would-be authoritarians.

As reported by Breitbart News, one-fifth — 20 percent — of all college students say they support the use of violence to shut down political and cultural speech they disagree with,  according to a new survey:

Motivated by what he calls the “narrowing window of permissible topics” on campus, Brookings Institute Fellow and UCLA Professor John Villasenor set out to uncover exactly how college students felt about the right to free expression on campus. His findings were somewhat shocking.

In a survey of 1,500 current American college students by the Brookings Institute, 44 percent of respondents said that they don’t believe hate speech is protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution. According to the survey, women are more likely to believe that hate speech is not protected by the Constitution, with 49 percent of female respondents claiming that the First Amendment does not protect hate speech as opposed to 38 percent of male respondents.

In addition he found that 62 percent of Left-wing students said it should be permissible to shout down speakers with opposing views, compared to 39 percent of Right-leaning students.

As for the 20 percent who said it’s okay to use violence to shut down speech, they answered affirmatively to this question: “A student group opposed to the speaker uses violence to prevent the speaker from speaking. Do you agree or disagree that the student group’s actions are acceptable?”

Another 53 percent of respondents claimed that they would prefer their campus to restrict speech that can be considered “offensive or biased against certain groups of people.”

As has been the case in past surveys that asked similar questions and produced similar findings, what’s missing is a determination of just who gets to decide what is and is not “offensive or biased” to which groups. Herein lies the problem with attempts to restrict any speech, as our founders knew and understood: Anyone can be offended by anything; restricting speech, even if based on consensus, is still restricting speech, which is dangerous and will eventually lead to wider restrictions and outright bans.


And let’s face it, what these kids are being taught to oppose isn’t “speech” per se, it’s conservative speech, values, mores, and ideals.

Many of these young people will become our next generation of leaders, and those who don’t lead will vote their philosophy.

But there is some good news: The belief that speech should be violently opposed is not at all pervasive among college students, as The Atlantic points out.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

America’s universities now becoming terrorist training hubs for Antifa

(National SentinelCivil Unrest: Only in today’s messed up, hyper-politicized environment is fascism disguised as “anti-fascism,” authoritarianism disguised as “democracy,” and political differences of opinion defined as hate — which perfectly explains why most college campuses have turned into major recruiting hubs for domestic terrorists.

red-alert-FO-160x600A pair of professors — one from Purdue University and the other from Stanford University — are using their positions to actively recruit for an organization that the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI determined was a “domestic terrorist” organization during the Obama administration.

As Campus Reform notes, the organization is officially known as Campus Antifascist Network, or CAN — but its goals and objectives align perfectly with Antifa, the alleged “anti-fascist” fascist group responsible for nine-tenths of the political violence at GOP nominee Donald J. Trump’s political rallies and events last year.

To understand the ‘logic’ of the violent, anarchist Alt-Left, the professors are insisting that they only support “self-defense” by “those who are being threatened by fascists” — the same BS excuse Antifa terrorists use to attack peaceful conservative and pro-Trump supporters.

Campus Reform noted further that the professors’ goal in forming CAN is to drive groups it has self-defined as “fascists” completely “off campus.”

Inside Higher Ed noted further:

Network co-organizer Bill Mullen, a professor of American studies at Purdue University, on Wednesday called CAN a “big tent” that “welcomes anyone committed to fighting fascism.”

“We are diverse in our political points of view but unified by our fight against fascism,” he said. The idea is “to drive racists off campuses and to protect the most vulnerable from fascist attack.”

But really, CAN isn’t going to be “diverse” because like other anarchist Alt-Left organizations including Antifa, these soon-to-be domestic terrorists have already decided that Trump and his supporters, which include many conservatives, are the enemy.

“The election of Donald Trump has emboldened fascist and white nationalist groups nationwide, on campus and off, and their recent upsurge requires anti-fascists to take up the call to action once again,” reads an invitation to join the group, which was posted on social media this week by David Palumbo-Liu, the Louise Hewlett Nixon Professor and professor of comparative literature at Stanford University.

“Since Trump’s election, fascists, neo-fascists, and their allies have used blatantly Islamophobic, anti-semitic, racist, misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic, and ableist messaging and iconography to recruit to their ranks and intimidate students, faculty, and staff,” he continued.

“The time to take action is now,” he said, noting, “we call on all interested individuals and organizations to support or join” CAN.

So there you have it: Because there are likely some white supremacist and neo-Nazi supporters of Trump, all of his supporters must be similarly racist and bigoted, right? Because who else but racist bigots would support a guy like Trump — is how their ‘logic’ goes. So to these fools, all 62.9 million Trump voters are the enemy.

In an interview with Campus Reform, Palumbo-Liu used the same code language all Alt-Left Marxists have used to justify shutting down opposing political speech with violence. He said “the groups that concern [CAN] the most are fascist in the sense they espouse a hateful ideology that targets particular groups based on race, ethnicity, religion, [or] sexuality, and wish to dominate, exclude, drive out, and harm members of those groups with force and violence.” (Related: Campus “tolerance” on parade as WHITE or STRAIGHT students banned from LGBTQ “safe space.”)

Of course, Antifa and aligned groups like Black Lives Matter are guilty of the same thingsthey are accusing other groups of doing. In fact, according to the federal government, Antifa is worse, having reached the level of domestic terrorism.

“The issue really is not speech, but rather the kinds of actions a group is known to engage in that precisely impinge upon others’ free speech, academic freedom, and civil liberties,” Palumbo-Liu said. “We are organizing to protect members of campus communities from groups that come to campus to provoke physical confrontations, purposefully destroy property, invade individuals’ privacy.”

That’s exactly what DHS and the FBI said Antifa does — show up to provoke violence with the Right.

This story originally appeared at NewsTarget.com.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Shock poll: More than HALF of Virginia residents would ban free speech on campus to protect snowflakes’ feelings

(National SentinelFirst Amendment: The political Left in America has long sought to undermine our constitutional system and replace it with a more authoritarian model of government more akin to European-style socialism.

A new shock poll out of Virginia shows just how far the Left has advanced its anti-constitutional agenda.

As reported by The Daily Caller, just over half of Virginians would limit free speech on college campuses so that little snowflake college students would not have to be exposed to any differences of opinion or situations where they might have to actually defend their own points of view:

“A very narrow majority” of the 806 adult Virginia residents polled said they think colleges and universities should emphasize “protecting everyone on campus from discrimination, even if it means there are negative consequences for voicing one’s opinions.”

Just 40 percent of the poll participants said colleges and universities should emphasize “allowing everyone on campus to have unlimited freedom of expression, even if it means some groups of people may face discrimination.”

Now mind you, one person’s “discrimination” is another person’s difference of opinion. Leftists have portrayed President Donald J. Trump’s travel ban from six terrorism-infested countries as a “discriminatory Muslim ban” when it is nothing of the sort, for example. And his upcoming decision to reverse President Obama’s very unconstitutional DACA program is going to be considered “racist” and “discriminatory” by the Left when again, it’s nothing of the kind.

It is genuinely shocking to see a majority — or even a very large plurality — of Virginians favor shutting down speech simply because they disagree with it.

What would our first president — Virginian and founding father George Washington — think about that?

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Clemson U. Prof says ALL Republicans are ‘racist scum’

(National SentinelAcademia & Activism: Legitimate “diversity of thought” and equality of ideas continue to die slow deaths on America’s college campuses, as one assistant professor at Clemson University has just proven.

As reported by the Washington Free Beacon:

Bart Knijnenburg, who teaches in the School of Computing, allegedly wrote in recent posts, “I admire anyone who stands up against white supremacy. Violent or non-violent,” with the hashtag “#PunchNazis.”

He also denounced “All republicans” as responsible for alt-right violence and demanded they either “denounce” and “renounce” their GOP affiliation, “or admit you’re a racist.”

He labeled all Republicans as “racist scum,” as documented by Campus Reform.

Not all of the responses to this ass hat’s generalization of tens of millions of Americans was positive, as you might guess.

One individual wrote, “We must be careful not to generalize as this is arguably the root cause of the extreme right’s existence.

“I’ve always looked up to you, as my 1st yr mentor but also for passing on the idea to study abroad. But it saddens me a bit to see this coming from you,” the man added.

The university, of course, demurred.

John Gouch, assistant director/online news manager of the Clemson Newsstand and Mark Land, vice president for university relations, said in a statement, “The university is aware of remarks attributed to a Clemson faculty member, which appear to have come from his personal Facebook account. Those remarks are not reflective of the university’s views, and university leadership has consistently made it clear that expressions advocating violence or hatred have no place on this, or any, college campus.”

Make no mistake, this is the Left’s thinking, laid bare. Understand also that when your political opponents no longer view you as having any worth to society, there is no “reconciling” with them.

You can guess what happens next.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

College ‘snowflakes’ all want safe spaces? Not according to this new survey

(National SentinelHigher Education: Many Americans have been conditioned by the disgusting “mainstream media” to believe there is near-universal acceptance of, and demand for, so-called “safe spaces” on college campuses – refuges where the little snowflakes can all go to in order to escape speech, political ideology and expressed thoughts they disagree with.

chief-organics-msmIn the real world, however, that’s not the case at all. In fact, a new survey found that a solid majority of American college and university students have little use for them.

As reported by The Daily Signal:

Sixty-two percent of students did not agree with or felt indifferent to safe spaces, according to a poll of 1,659 current college students taken by LendEDU, a student loan consolidation and refinancing organization. Of those surveyed, 37 percent agreed that safe spaces “are completely out of touch with reality” and 25 percent said they were indifferent. Thirty-six percent said they felt safe spaces are “absolutely necessary”.

Perhaps worse than anything is that these artificial enclaves of ‘security’ are being championed by moronic university administrators, who are now complicit in graduating a generation of college graduates who have no real-world coping skills whatsoever:

Some university presidents, such as Morton Schapiro of Northwestern University, say they believe that safe spaces are essential to collegiate learning.

“The best hope we have of creating an inclusive community is to first create spaces where members of each group feel safe” Schapiro wrote for The Washington Post.

Schapiro also spoke to new Northwestern freshmen on safe spaces in September 2016.

“‘The people who decry safe spaces do it from their segregated housing places, from their jobs without diversity—they do it from their country clubs … ‘It just drives me nuts,’” Schapiro said, according to The Daily Northwestern, the university’s news publication.

No, moron, it is you who are sequestered – tucked away in your ivory tower with your $1.25 million annual pay and tenured job status. Most Americans who are disgusted by “safe spaces” and the idiots who created and espouse them don’t have country club memberships, segregated housing, diversity-free jobs – or million-dollar-plus salaries.

And now we know that most college students don’t agree with Schapiro, either, making him even more out of touch with most Americans and reality.


Not even kidding: College will require “Abolition of Whiteness” course for political science majors

By J. D. Heyes, editor-in-chief

(National SentinelAcademia: Many once-fine institutions for higher learning in America are slowly but very steadily being transformed from educational facilities to cultural revolution centers aimed at destroying traditional American principles, values and mores.

How else can you possibly explain this outrage: Requiring political science majors to take and pass a course called “Abolition of Whiteness” that is little more than mandatory shaming of anyone born Caucasian.

As reported by Campus Reform, Hunter College in New York City, beginning in the Fall 2017 semester, will require the course, which is to be taught by “Women and Gender Studies” Prof. Jennifer Gaboury. The course is cross-listed for her department and the Political Science Department, and will fulfill one of four classes in the “4 subfields of political science” under the overarching “POLSC 204: Contemporary Issues in Political Theory.”

As someone who holds a BA in political science, I can tell you that this course offers nothing in terms of genuine understanding of American government — how it functions, its constitutional underpinning, political parties, the legislative process, etc. Rather, it is just another way insane Left-wing “academics” can feed into the racist and preposterous construct that whatever ails our country can and must be laid at the feet of white people. (Related: Read Evergreen State College students SEIZE campus, begin forced searches of vehicles for white professor who refused to kow-tow to liberal insanity.)

As Campus Reform notes, the school’s official course catalog doesn’t say very much about what the course actually discusses. However, a flyer advertising a previous version of the course from the Fall 2016 semester says it is “an overview of whiteness studies in the United States,” focusing specifically “on concepts of consciousness, in/visibility, disavowal, and resentment.”

So in other words, students are taught that not only are whites the epitome of all that is bad in America, they should feel badly about creating so much “resentment” for all they’ve allegedly done, and must disavow their own race.

It isn’t as though a degree in “Women and Gender Studies” is going to land you a decent job, but what is a course like this supposed to add, specifically, to someone’s understanding of government?

Nothing, of course. It’s not about that. It’s about meting out punishment for being white.

“We’ll be examining how whiteness — and/or white supremacy and violence — is intertwined with conceptions of gender, race, sexuality, class, body ability, nationality, and age,” says the course description. It adds, “a petition for this course is on file with the College Senate so that it fulfills Pluralism and Diversity Parts B, C, or D.,” which is a reference to mandatory course work that, respectively, focuses on “the historical conditions, perspectives and/or intellectual traditions” of ethnic minorities in the United States, women, people with non-traditional sexual orientations, as well as Europeans.

While the course does not yet appear to have been officially added to the list of classes which satisfy the “Pluralism and Diversity requirement,” the mere fact that it has been proposed and being seriously considered is worse than outrageous.

If there is any aspect of “Abolition of Whiteness” appropriate to the instruction of political science in this day and age, instruction which includes lessons in political activity and political behavior, which party — rather, which ideology — do you think gives the subject the most serious consideration?

If you said Donald Trump’s party, you’d be wrong. Trump isn’t the “white supremacist” he’s framed as being, his supporters aren’t the racists they’ve been portrayed as being. In fact, only the Alt-Left, which is squarely ensconced in the Democratic Party, pushes the narrative that whites are evil, whites are bad, and if only power were taken away from whites then America would become utopia. (Related: Read America’s Universities Have Become Training Camps For Violent Left-Wing Extremism.)

No course like this should be taught on any college campus, but can you even imagine such a course being suggested and approved called “Abolition of Blackness,” where students are taught to “disavow” and “resent” black people? Or Hispanics? Or Native Americans?

I can’t either.

This article originally appeared at Natural News.


Evergreen State College students SEIZE campus, begin forced searches of vehicles for white professor who refused to kow-tow to liberal insanity

(National SentinelAcademia: If ever there were a perfect example of the phrase, “The inmates have taken over the asylum,” this is it.

On Friday the Washington Times reported that in the preceding 72 hours, students had taken over — yes, taken over — Evergreen State College in Olympia, WA. The college is known for its uber-Left-wing politics and its policy of appraising student performance not with grades but with “narrative evaluations.”

Only one adult has attempted to stop them — a professor — and now police have told him to hold his classes off-campus because it’s not safe for him to be there.

As the Times noted:

Students…who filmed their exploits and posted the videos on social media, have occupied and barricaded the library, shouting down anyone who disagrees with them or shows insufficient passion for racial justice.

Biology professor Bret Weinstein was berated by dozens of students outside of his classroom Tuesday morning for refusing to participate in an event in which white people were invited to leave campus for a day. Now, he says police have told him to hold his classes off campus due to safety concerns.

Weinstein’s ‘crime’ was writing a ‘racist’ email opposing the “Day of Absence & Day of Presence” demonstration, in which he said, “On a college campus, one’s right to speak — or to be — should never be based on skin color.”


This is just so over-the-top it almost defies belief. And honestly, were this happening somewhere else besides a college campus — say, at a public library or in an office building — there would be cops and SWAT teams and snipers all over the place, and the perps would be headed straight to jail when apprehended.

In what could be the understatement of the year, Weinstein told the paper in an interview that things are “out of control at Evergreen.”

You think so, professor?

Worse — yeah, it can get worse — the cops believe that the domestic terrorists who have taken over (because that’s really what they are) were actually looking to kidnap Weinstein.

“Police told me protesters stopped cars yesterday, demanding information about occupants,”(you know, like good little Nazi Brown Shirts) he told the paper. “They believe I was being sought. It appears that the campus has been under effective control over protestors since 9:30 a.m. Tuesday.”

Then he said this:

“Police are on lockdown, hamstrung by the college administration. Students, staff and faculty are not safe.”

Mind you, the pathetic, enabling college administrator has already pre-empted any notion of punishment for the terrorists, promising instead to find out why they’re so upset under the guise of a “major review.”

“First and foremost, I want to state that there will be, as far as I know, no charges filed against any students involved in actions that occurred this morning,” Bridges said. “We will be conducting a major review, an investigation of all that occurred and will be reporting back to you, the campus community, about exactly what happened, why it happened and what we intend to do about the incident — not the incident, excuse me, the actions that were taken, both students, staff and faculty involved.”

In addition, this idiot will implement — pursuant to “demands” — a new student conduct code, different faculty evaluation standards and, of course, as the Times noted, “enact annual sensitivity training for all faculty, staff and police that emphasizes the eradication of anti-black racism.” Anti-white racism, though, appears to be completely acceptable.

Natural News founder Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, discussed the ongoing issues occurring on American college campuses just last week.

“Over the last decade or so, we’ve all [watched] in horror as America’s universities have been turned into what can now clearly be called extremism training camps for left-wing fascists,” he wrote. “Instead of teaching students to be responsible adults with critical thinking skills, colleges and universities now focus on obedience training coupled with deeply-ingrained hatred, intolerance and violence toward those who have opposing points of view.”

To shore up Adams’ very correct assessment, a student from Evergreen State admitted as much when he and a few others crashed a staff event that included faculty’s families, the Times reported.

“Didn’t you educate us on how to do s—t like this?” one student said. “It was you that taught us that in class. Right, though? You taught us to go and change the world. Ain’t that what you all sell on that state college page? To when s—t is wrong that we should try to change it? So why you all in here eating cake and chewing?”

The Alt-Left Marxist morons who run American campuses have created these beasts, and now even they can’t control them. Get ready for a wave of social unrest the likes of which America has never seen. And once again, we can thank the crazy, lunatic Left for it.

This article was originally published at NaturalNews.com.


Coulter speech cancellation rescinded, but how will UC-Berkeley protect her?

(NationalSentinel) Free Speech: The University of California-Berkeley has rescinded its cancellation of a speech by conservative pundit, author and lawyer Ann Coulter after initially claiming the institution could not guarantee she’d be safe if she showed up.

While rescinding the cancellation was the right thing to do, since after all college campuses have historically been reservoirs of unbridled free speech, the school’s initial concerns about her safety remain: Just how will UC-Berkeley protect Ms. Coulter

Because if she receives the same level of non-participation from Berkeley and Oakland Police that other conservative speakers have gotten in the recent past, she’ll be lucky if she comes out of there alive.

Without a major show of force accompanied by orders to do whatever it takes to protect her and her right to speak – in the same way that then-governor of California Ronald Reagan acted to combat out-of-control protestors on the campus of UC-Berkeley in 1969 – then we’re likely to see a level of violence that even exceeded what we saw during Milo Yiannopoulos’ February disaster.

Reagan had no problem ordering Berkeley Police and the California Highway Patrol to quell the violence anyway they saw fit. And quell it they did – with tear gas and buckshot. One student protestor was killed, while more than 100 were wounded. After that, Reagan declared a state of emergency and called in the California National Guard. The violence subsided.

There is no way far-Left Gov. Jerry Brown will do that today, especially for someone like Ann Coulter. Now, if Che Guevara or Fidel Castro were still alive and wanted to speak at Berkeley, Brown and the kooks who run that state would spare no effort or expense to protect them.

Which brings us back to the problem of Alt-Left violence on college campuses directed at speakers who don’t share the same Marxist/socialist views as many of the professors and their charges.

The New York Post says the answer is “new management.” That’s partially correct, but given the far-Leftist bent of most academics these days, it’s likely that all that would accomplish is moving Leftist administrators and professors from one institution to another.

No, the answer is order. Order must be enforced on these campuses. As the Post noted, too many students now believe that it’s okay to shut down the speech of someone they don’t agree with, and that using violence to do so is perfectly fine.

This kind of thought is being reinforced with every conservative speaker attacked and shut down.

The better solution, we think, is more along the lines of what former Justice Department chief of staff (for Reagan), author, scholar and talk show host Mark Levin suggested on-air recently: President Donald J. Trump should federalize the California National Guard, order them to the Berkeley campus with instructions to meet protestor force with force, and have Coulter accompanied on-stage by Attorney General Jeff Sessions (and whatever number of federal agents are necessary):

Unless or until the thuggish, Brown Shirt-type of violence against any speaker of any political persuasion (though the violence is mostly being directed at conservative speakers and thought) is met with a superior show of force, these kind of incidents are only going to escalate. Deaths, at some point, will occur.

If the institutions themselves can’t or won’t take the appropriate measures – beefed-up security, expulsion without tuition refund of students who behave violently, keeping non-students off campus – then obviously someone else with the power to do so has to step up.

Not only lives, but the Constitution must be defended.

Update: Breitbart News is reporting that Berkeley scheduled Coulter’s speech for a day when classes are out.

Coulter responded via Twitter:


Note to Democratic leaders: George Soros has hijacked your party, and you let him

(NationalSentinel) Another college campus event featuring a conservative speaker and supporter of President Donald Trump was hijacked, with property destroyed and some of his supporters beaten unconscious by, we’re guessing, thugs that are subsisting on money donated by billionaire Left-wing agitator George Soros.

09-02-16-03-17-18_promo_article_160x600-option-11As reported by Breitbart, a planned speech by gay conservative activist and tech editor for the web site, Milo Yiannopoulos, at UC-Berkeley was canceled after criminals rioted and rampaged across the university.

Breitbart Senior Editor MILO’s event at UC Berkeley tonight has been evacuated following violence and several fires started by masked “anti-fascist” protesters.

There’s more, but you get the picture, as this kind of thing has played out now dozens of times since Trump began his campaign in the summer of 2015.

What’s truly amazing is that number of Americans who honestly believe that a) this kind of violence is justified because b) any action taken against Trump is legitimate because c) the Left can make its own rules when it comes to political opposition.

Only, it can’t. And sooner or later, this will be made very plain to the minority of people suckling at the teat of Soros, when, at some point, they face mass arrest and are charged with domestic terrorism.

Because that’s all this really is. It’s gone beyond “protesting;” it’s gone beyond “rioting.” It’s domestic terrorism, and frankly, as a financier of these brazen attacks on the civil society, an international warrant should be issued by the Justice Department for his arrest.  He should be made an example of, because if he’s not – if no one is held responsible for this domestic terrorism – then it will continue to escalate into open warfare.

And honestly, only an idiot would want that. Or an anarchist.

Note to Democrats: Your party has been hijacked by a former Nazi collaborator; are you okay with that?