Left-wing HACK journalist tweets college professors should DROWN conservative students

(National SentinelFringe: A Left-wing former contributor to Deadspin gave a harsh response to a conservative activist who tweeted out that conservative students on college campuses are treated unfairly by liberal professors who dominate most institutions.

“I get countless of messages from students who say professors are lowering their grades & penalizing them for being conservative,” Charlie Kirk of Turning Point USA tweeted Wednesday. “Leftists dominating higher education represent a grave threat to our country & culture.

“Conservative students shouldn’t be targeted for disagreeing,” he added.

That tweet earned him a now-deleted response from Jesse Farrar, formerly of Deadspin and Vice, who wrote professors should instead “hold the conservative students heads under water until they stop breathing.”

Kirk responded: “I’m sure he is joking, but imagine if conservatives made a joke like that against liberals?”

“I am not joking,” Farrar wrote back, later deleting the tweet.

Kirk told Fox News the response “stunned” him. “He’s calling for the public death of conservative students,” he added. “They disagree with our worldview so much that [liberals] literally want us dead.”

Deadspin was contacted about Farrar’s comment by the Independent Review-Journal, and Deputy Editor Barry Petchesky said that while he didn’t agree with Farrar’s “method,” he said, “I can’t argue that it wouldn’t make the world a better place,” Fox News reported.

“So, mass genocide of conservative students would make the world a better place,” Kirk noted.

J. D. Heyes, editor-in-chief of The National Sentinel, noted that liberal journalists in the U.S. today are actually doing Americans a favor by revealing their true identities.

“In the age of Trump, these bozos are doing a full-reveal and letting us see them for the anti-American shills they’ve always been,” he said. “What’s more, people like this are taking over the Democratic Party, with the party’s blessing.

“Maybe now it’s easier to see why conservatives and Republicans in Congress should stop trying to ‘work with’ these Marxist lunatics who are openly advocating our deaths,” he added. “Imagine how it will be if they ever really do take power.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Promise KEPT: Govt. shrinks dramatically in Trump’s FIRST year; pledges ‘MORE to come’

(National SentinelLess is More: During his campaign, then-GOP candidate Donald J. Trump pledged to dramatically reduce the size, scope, and reach of the federal bureaucracy. A year into his first term, and by any standard, the president has begun to deliver on his pledge.

As reported by The Washington Post, the shift to a leaner, less expensive, less powerful and more efficient federal workforce has long been sought by conservatives. At Trump’s current pace, the paper said, the federal workforce could eventually shrink to levels not seen in decades.

“By the end of September, all Cabinet departments except Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs and Interior had fewer permanent staff than when Trump took office in January — with most shedding many hundreds of employees, according to an analysis of federal personnel data by The Washington Post,” the paper reported.

“The diminishing federal footprint comes after Trump promised in last year’s campaign to ‘cut so much your head will spin,’ and it reverses a boost in hiring under President Barack Obama. The falloff has been driven by an exodus of civil servants, a diminished corps of political appointees and an effective hiring freeze,” the Post continued.

Though Congress failed again to pass a budget during Trump’s first year, the dramatic spending cuts that the president introduced in the spring, which would reduce outlays for some agencies by as much as 30 percent, has led to a spending slowdown, officials as several agencies said.

Additional cuts are on the horizon.

The White House has warned federal agencies to expect more of the same budget reduction efforts in the 2019 budget, which the administration plans to announced in early next year.

The cuts are part of the White House’s effort to pay for the tax cut by lowering the federal deficit, another Trump pledge.

The climate among federal workers has also changed, the Post noted. For instance, hundreds who were fearful that their jobs could be slashed have already voluntarily departed for employment elsewhere.

Others were miffed by new rules laid out by supervisors aimed at holding poorly performing workers and problem employees to account.

A hiring freeze that Trump implemented via executive order but was technically lifted in the spring remains in effect at many agencies, the paper noted.

Meanwhile, Democrats have held up presidential appointments, leading to leadership vacuums at some agencies.

Tony Reardon, president of the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents 150,000 federal workers at more than 30 agencies, told the Post that “morale has never been lower” among the federal workforce.

But the administration refuted that, citing an employee survey taken earlier this year that showed an uptick in morale across most federal agencies.

In a statement, White House spokesman Raj Shah said Trump “is committed to streamlining government for the 21st century, reducing bloat, duplication and waste, and focusing resources on key priorities like public safety and protecting our nation’s homeland.”

Conservatives are elated at the Trump administration’s progress.

“This is going very well,” said tax reform activist Grover Norquist. “Slow and steady — for all the bluster, this is how you downsize government without engendering blowback.”

For his part, Trump on Sunday tweeted that there was “more to come” in 2018.

“Jobs are kicking in and companies are coming back to the U.S. Unnecessary regulations and high taxes are being dramatically Cut, and it will only get better. MUCH MORE TO COME!” he said.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/947236393184628741

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

#nevertrump Conservatives soften, HAIL the president’s first-year achievements on way to making America GREAT AGAIN

(National SentinelComing Around: A cabal of ‘never Trump’ conservatives have begun to soften their tone towards President Donald J. Trump and have begun to take note of his first-year accomplishments, Breitbart News reported.

Earlier this week in his New York Times column, Ross Douthat, a frequent critic of the president, praised Trump’s strategy in taking on and helping defeat the Islamic State.

“[I]f you had told me in late 2016 that almost a year into the Trump era the caliphate would be all-but-beaten without something far worse happening in the Middle East, I would have been surprised and gratified. So very provisionally, credit belongs where it’s due — to our soldiers and diplomats, yes, but to our president as well,” Douthat wrote in a column titled, “A War Trump Won.”

He went on to take the establishment media to task for not making more of the victory, noting that the media’s failure to do so was likely because it conflicts with the narrative of “Trumpian disaster.”

Prominent Trump critic David French of National Review echoed Douthat’s sentiment on the defeat of ISIS.

“This is one of the best stories of the young Trump administration,” he wrote. “While many of the battles were fought under Obama, Trump pursued the enemy relentlessly. He delegated decision-making to commanders in the field, they fought within the laws of war, and they prevailed. Trump promised to defeat ISIS, and he has delivered a tremendous victory.

The so-called ‘dean’ of the #nevertrump movement, NR editor Rich Lowry has written a piece in which he listed Trump’s accomplishments in office, which he calls a “solid record of achievement.”

“It’s hard to see how a conventional Republican president would have done much better, except if he had managed to get Obamacare repealed, which was always going to be a dicey proposition given the narrow Republican majority in the Senate,” Lowry writes.

“If any Republican would have done much of what Trump has, three acts stand out — pulling out of the Paris accords, decertifying the Iran deal, and declaring Jerusalem the capital of Israel,” he added. “All three demonstrated an imperviousness to polite opinion that is one of Trump’s signature qualities.”

Also, the Washington Examiner, a conservative outlet that has frequently criticized the president, said in an editorial that he’s “on a roll.”

“One of the narratives of 2017 has been that Trump and Republicans on Capitol Hill have failed to achieve anything substantive. This has always been untrue, but in recent weeks it has become a ridiculous fiction,” it said. “Amid drama, protest, miscues, and unprecedented political vitriol, real conservative victories are being achieved for America.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Trump announces five more potential Supreme Court nominees White House says are like Gorsuch

(National SentinelJudicial Branch: President Donald J. Trump has announced the selection of five additional judges among those he will consider nominating to the U.S. Supreme Court when there is another vacancy.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative stalwart on the high-profile U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, is a leading contender, the Washington Times reported.

Trump also named as potential Supreme Court picks Judge Amy Barrett of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals; Judge Britt Grant of the Georgia Supreme Court; Judge Kevin Newsom of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and Oklahoma Supreme Court Justice Patrick Wyrick.

Though there currently are no vacancies on the nation’s highest court, there has been speculation that liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and swing-vote Justice Anthony M. Kennedy.

Added to the president’s initial list of 20 judicial nominees — all of whom were met with approval by conservatives — the White House said the additional five are all in the mold of Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch.

President Trump will choose a nominee for a future Supreme Court vacancy, should one arise, from this updated list of 25 individuals,” the White House said. “The president remains deeply committed to identifying and selecting outstanding jurists in the mold of Justice Gorsuch. These additions, like those on the original list released more than a year ago, were selected with input from respected conservative leaders.”

Judicial Crisis Network chief counsel and policy director Carrie Severino called the new candidates “some of the best and brightest judges in the nation,” according to the Times.

“These men and women have spent years in the trenches of state and federal government fighting for the Constitution and the rule of law,” she said. “They represent a diverse range of backgrounds, including both state and federal judges, three who were former state solicitors general with first-hand experience protecting our constitutional balance of powers.”


Here’s the next big thing in survival farming! Click Here!


Trump is already well on his way to remake the federal judiciary. He has already eight federal appeals court judges, the most at this point in any presidency since Richard Nixon.

Also, the Senate is set to confirm Trump’s ninth appellate court nominee, former deputy White House counsel Gregory Katsas, within weeks.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Conservative groups to Team McConnell: ‘Step aside, please’

(National SentinelGOP Leaderless: A group of conservative organizations is asking Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other top Republicans to step down after their failure to pass any substantive legislation despite controlling both chambers of the Legislative Branch.

The groups include the Senate Conservatives Fund, Tea Party Patriots, FreedomWorks and For America, Western Journalism reported. In a news conference earlier this month, officials with the organizations noted that no major legislation has been passed that was promised by nearly every Republican lawmaker, including a repeal and replace of Obamacare, budget cuts and — thus far — tax reform.

“You and the rest of your leadership team were given the majority because you pledged to stop the steady flow of illegal immigration,” states their letter to McConnell, according to Fox News. “You have done nothing. You pledged to reduce the size of this oppressive federal government. You have done nothing. You pledged to reduce, and ultimately eliminate the out-of-control deficit spending that is bankrupting America. You have done nothing. You promised to repeal Obamacare, ‘root and branch.’ You have done nothing. You promised tax reform. You have done nothing.”

According to former Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli, giving Team McConnell a vote of no confidence was not a knee-jerk reaction, but rather years in the making.

“This wasn’t sudden. There have been problems with McConnell for a long time,” Cuccinelli told Western Journalism.

“You will recall in years past, he’s said, ‘Just get us the Senate and we’ll take on President Obama.’ Well, they didn’t take on President Obama. ‘Just get us the House — just get us the presidency.’ Well, now all those are in Republican hands,” Cuccinelli said. “Here we are closing in on the end of October and they literally haven’t passed a major legislative accomplishment.

“It is not beyond the realm of possibility that we could get to Jan. 20, 2019, without any of what I’d call ‘the big three’ items the president campaigned on: securing the border, including the wall; tax cuts; and the repeal of Obamacare — which they’ve been campaigning on for four elections,” he continued.

Polls show that for the most part, a majority of Americans want all three of those agenda items passed. Dealing with illegal immigration, in particular, was a major factor in President Donald J. Trump’s victory.

For his part, Cuccinelli said that McConnell isn’t interested in backing candidates for the Senate who will help pass the president’s conservative agenda issues.

“You can not name for me a time when he has fought as hard with a Democrat as he has fought with conservative Republicans on numerous occasions,” he said. “What he wants is control of his own caucus. He won’t support people like Joe Miller and Daryl Glenn, regardless of how spectacularly qualified they are because he isn’t about a Republican majority, he’s about a ‘McConnell majority.’”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Michelle Obama continues to play the race card in her quest to trash the GOP

(National SentinelRace Baiter: Frankly, we’ve never seen two people who were more focused on a person’s skin color than Barack and Michelle Obama.

From his first days in the Oval Office, the former president made race an issue when he criticized a white police officer for arresting a black Harvard professor — one of Barack’s former professors and a friend, Henry Louis Gates — because the cop had gotten a call that someone was attempting to break into a home. “The police acted stupidly,” Obama famously said — even before he had all of the information regarding the incident.

It only got worse from there. Every high-profile incident involving encounters between black men and police officers was scrutinized and criticized by the former president.

The former first lady’s race-baiting is infamous as well. After Democrats began to coalesce around her husband’s first campaign for the White House in February 2008, she said, “People in this country are ready for change and hungry for a different kind of politics and … for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.”

And her racism has only gotten more pronounced since then. To wit: Tuesday at the Pennsylvania Conference for Women, former first lady Michelle Obama said when she attended the State of the Union address she would notice the Republican side was “all men, all white,” and that was why she argued many people of color “don’t trust politics,” Breitbart News reported.

She explained, “At the State of the Union address … when you are in the room what you can see is this real dichotomy. It’s a feeling of color almost. On one side of the room is literally gray and white. Literally, that is the color palette on one side of the room. On the other side of the room, there are yellows and blues and whites and greens. Physically, there’s a difference in color, in the tone, because on one side all men, all white, on the other side some woman, some people of color.”

We guess the former first lady doesn’t see all the Republican women in Congress — including Utah Rep. Mia Love, who is black. Or Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, who is black. Or Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is Latino. And on and on.

We’re guessing that the former first lady has forgotten that the Republican presidential field in 2016 was about as diverse as America and included a black physician, a female former CEO, Rubio, and another American of Latino descent, Sen. Ted Cruz. The Democrats, meanwhile, fielded three white people, two of whom are senior citizens.

As for why the GOP isn’t more diverse, perhaps it’s because of people like the Obamas, who continually divide the country along racial and ethnic lines in their bid to trash conservatives, constitutionalists, and Republicans of any moderation.

Barack and Michelle Obama are a huge part of the problem racial tensions have only worsened since they burst onto the national scene. They are not part of the solution and furthermore, they aren’t trying to be. It’s time we all understood that.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

The Left keeps saying ‘hate speech’ – we don’t think they know what that means

(National SentinelFirst Amendment: In the age of President Donald J. Trump, the Alt-Left “progressive” movement has begun an all-out assault on the Constitution’s guarantees of free speech, expression, and assembly, and they are being aided and abetted by a Democratic Party that has transformed itself into America’s largest hate group.

Through the use of violence and intimidation, domestic terrorist groups like Antifa are waging war against any individuals or groups who support Trump or conservative ideology, under the false premise of fighting against “racism” and “bigotry.”

As reported by Campus Reform, U.S. Rep. Anthony Brown, D-Md., said recently he plans to introduce legislation that would essentially permit college campuses to legally shut down free speech.

Under the guise of blocking “hate speech” — which is being defined by the radical Left as any speech that they disagree with — Brown’s measure seeks to give Leftist college administratorsthe power to do something they’ve wanted for decades: To criminalize conservative speech and conservative ideology.

As reported by The Diamondback:

If passed, the bill would require universities and colleges to demonstrate they have programs and initiatives in place that clearly define to students “what is acceptable speech and what is not acceptable speech,” Brown (D-Md.) said to a room of roughly 150 people at the Samuel Riggs IV Alumni Center.

For institutions that might lack the necessary resources to create these programs, the bill would set aside grant money to “take away any excuse,” Brown said.

So not only would his bill give university administrators arbitrary authority to decide what’s “acceptable” speech, Brown also seeks to reward their trashing of the Constitution’s protections with taxpayer money.

And of course, because Democrats are the real authoritarians, Brown’s measure would also ‘push’ universities to report hate crimes to local law enforcement (as if they didn’t already). What such provisions usually mean in Congress-speak is that while voluntary, they are written in such a way that gives the affected party no choice. It’s like saying, “Well, you don’t have to report this crime, but if you don’t, there’s another provision of my bill that will punish you in some way.”

“If you want to see things change, or at least change in government, you first have to know they’re happening,” Brown told the crowd. “That’s why we have to have the reporting requirement.”

Riiiight. 

Who is this guy fooling? And who does he think he is? What right does he have to decide, with the rest of the haters in the Democratic Party, who can and cannot speak on a college campus? (Related: Democrats Fast Becoming America’s Largest Hate Group As They Plan To Troll President Trump’s First Address To Congress.)

Brown’s bill is based on one incident in which a white student attending the University of Maryland who belonged to a Facebook group titled “Alt-Reich: Nation,” stabbed a fellow black student to death recently. And as horrific as that is, one senseless, race-based crime does not a trend make. Rather, Brown is simply taking advantage of the tragedy to push a larger agenda of shutting down political speech he and his fellow Democrats don’t like and cannot intellectually refute.

Think not? Brown also took the occasion of discussing his authoritarian legislation to do what allelected Democrats have done, especially minorities like him: Blame Trump. As Campus Reformnoted further:

Brown also said that he thinks there is a strong correlation between the election of President Trump and the increases in racism and anger that he claims are happening in portions of the white community.

Have you ever met anyone as hung up on race as a Democrat? It’s all they talk about. And why? Because their party is bankrupt, ideologically, and one of the only ways they can garner any support is to turn as many people as they can into victims. It’s disgusting, frankly.

Another way is to simply silence the opposition — with intimidation, violence, and, if possible, the law. That’s what a true “hate crime” looks like.

This story originally appeared at NewsTarget.com.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

The Southern Poverty Law Center: The REAL hate group that inspires Christian, conservative bigotry and violence

(National SentinelHate Factory: One of the things the Southern Poverty Law Center is most known for is its so-called “hate map,” in which it lists hundreds of organizations across the United States that it alone has designated as — what else? — hate groups.

The trouble is, not all of the SPLC’s designations are accurate. In fact, some of them are slanderous. And a few of their most slanderous and false designations in the past have led to deadly violence.

That’s why conservatives are pressuring the legacy media to stop using the SPLC’s hate map as a bona fide source of information, as reported by Truth Revolt:

The leaders, composed of the Family Research Council and signed by Media Research Center President Brent Bozell, published an open letter to the news media explaining why they should cease referencing the leftist SPLC’s biased propaganda in their reporting.

“The SPLC is a discredited, left-wing, political activist organization that seeks to silence its political opponents with a ‘hate group’ label of its own invention and application that is not only false and defamatory, but that also endangers the lives of those targeted with it,” the letter stated.

The groups pointed to the case of Floyd Lee Corkins II, who went into the Family Research Council’s headquarters about five years ago armed with a gun and the intent to kill everyone in there. A subsequent police investigation revealed that Corkins selected the FRC specificallybecause it was listed as a hate group on the SPLC map.

“Corkins intended to kill everyone in the building, then go on to terrorize additional organizations,” said the letter. “The U.S. attorney stated in federal court that Corkins targeted FRC and additional targets by using the SPLC website’s ‘Hate Map.’”

As media watchdogs noted, the legacy media and news networks ignored the role the SPLC’s map played in the Corkins incident. But since then Hollywood types and the reliably Left-wing “mainstream” media continue to cite the SPLC as a legitimate source, and unquestioningly so.

Now, in the wake of the Left-wing terrorist Antifa-on-white-supremacist violence at Charlottesville, Va., last month, the SPLC has only gained in notoriety, now attracting big-name donors — including actor George Clooney, who just donated $1 million to a real hate group, as NewsTarget reported:

A statement released on behalf of the couple said that they wanted to help in “the ongoing fight for equality” in the aftermath of the violent protests that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia, but their choice of recipient is raising more than a few eyebrows.

This is the same SPLC, mind you, that routinely designates pro-life and pro-Christian organizations as hate groups, just for having traditional views about marriage and for defending the unborn. (Related: This family-oriented non-profit lost its payment processing vendor after SPLC designated it a ‘hate group.’)

“Whether it’s shady money transfers or being discredited for decades by investigative journalists and charity watchdogs as a ‘direct mail scam,’ the Southern Poverty Law Center lost its way a long time ago,” said Kerri Kupec with Alliance Defending Freedom.

In their letter to various media, the groups noted that if outlets didn’t cut off ties to the SPLC, they were likely to help create “another Corkins.”

“We believe the media outlets that have cited the SPLC in recent days have not intended to target mainstream political groups for violent attack, but by recklessly linking the Charlottesville melee to the mainstream groups named on the SPLC website, we are left to wonder if another Floyd Lee Corkins will soon be incited to violence.”

And on that note, it is primarily angry Left-wing Americans who are committing the worst political violence. In addition to the Corkins incident a few years ago, another far-Left progressive and virulent supporter of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ presidential bid shot and wounded a number of Republican aides and House Majority Whip Steve Scalise of Louisiana at an early morning softball practice in June.

“Given the above points, and most alarmingly that the SPLC’s ‘hate group’ propaganda has been linked to two terrorist shootings in the D.C. area,” the letter noted, “we respectfully request that you cease using the SPLC’s data and its various lists and maps in your reporting.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Danger ahead: Americans’ political divide is getting wider, making reconciliation all but impossible

(National SentinelPolitics & Culture: A striking new survey reveals just how intense the divide between conservatives and liberals really is in America, following the election of one of the most divisive presidents ever — which came after eight years of the most divisive president in history, up to that point.

A new Wall Street Journal/NBC News survey of social trends has found that Washington’s division is manifesting itself in the American hinterlands as well:

The findings help explain why political divisions are now especially hard to bridge. People who identify with either party increasingly disagree not just on policy; they inhabit separate worlds of differing social and cultural values and even see their economic outlook through a partisan lens.

The wide gulf is visible in an array of issues and attitudes: Democrats are twice as likely to say they never go to church as are Republicans, and they are eight times as likely to favor action on climate change. One-third of Republicans say they support the National Rifle Association, while just 4% of Democrats do. More than three-quarters of Democrats, but less than one-third of Republicans, said they felt comfortable with societal changes that have made the U.S. more diverse.

What is more, Americans’ view of the economy, the direction of the nation and the future has even come to be closely aligned with their feelings about the current president, the survey found.

“Our political compass is totally dominating our economic and world views about the country,” said GOP pollster Bill McInturff, who conducted the survey with Democratic pollster Fred Yang. “Political polarization is not a new thing. The level under Trump is the logical outcome of a generation-long trend.”

More:

One measure of how much more polarized the electorate is than a generation ago can be found in views of the president. Eight months into the 1950s presidency of Republican Dwight Eisenhower, 60% of Democrats approved of the job he was doing. That level of cross-party support for a new president remained above 40% until Bill Clinton, when only 20% of Republicans approved of his performance after eight months in 1993. For Barack Obama, Republican support dropped to 16% at this point in his presidency in 2009.

Under Mr. Trump, that trend has continued and intensified. His job-approval rating among Americans overall has remained in recent months at about 40%, but just 8% of Democrats approve of the job he is doing, the survey found. By contrast, 80% of Republicans approve.

The last time Americans were this politically polarized, we killed nearly 700,000 of us. And while there isn’t one overarching political, social, and cultural ill — slavery — to divide us, there are large, overarching issues, as reflected in the WSJ survey.

Culturally, we have sizeable, competing pluralities who are simultaneously trying to change and preserve traditional American history and culture. From Confederate monuments to football, Leftists who can’t control and dominate anything simply want to ban everything.

As such, there are bad political, cultural, and social actors — like this schmuck — who are doing all they can to exacerbate the divide.

This isn’t going to end well if we don’t come to the understanding that not only can this divide not be bridged, tens of millions of Americans have decided they don’t want it bridged.

A sensible, peaceful divorce is the only way to prevent turning America into one giant Syria.

We have to stop pretending that there is any other solution.

We’ve been here before as a country. Hell, we’re still fighting that civil war in many respects.

Do we really want to fight another one?

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

making-case-for-secession-logo

Washington Post, which hides behind First Amendment to publish FAKE NEWS, now calls for end of free speech for conservatives

By J. D. Heyes, editor-in-chief

(National SentinelCulture Wars: The Left is engaging in an all-out assault against Americans’ constitutional form of government for decades, seeking to replace it with a more authoritarian form of European-style socialism. The assault continues today and has taken on a bizarre, hypocritical form.

At a time when the Left-wing “mainstream” media is seeing its dominance and influence wane dramatically, it is lashing out against conservatives in unprecedented ways. For instance, the Washington Post, which has published more than its share of “fake news” in the Age of Trump, is now actually calling for limiting the free speech of those it disagrees with politically.

As reported by The Daily Caller, the First Amendment is supposed to guarantee freedom of speech and expression to everyone, regardless of whether or not said speech is universally acceptable. But the Post doesn’t think so; in fact, the Post believes that politically conservative speech should be banned on the basis of how Left-wing liberalsdefine it. Otherwise the editorial team would not have given voice to history professor Jennifer Delton recently, who argues that liberals should not allow people they deem “alt-right provocateurs” to speak on college campuses. (Related: College students “triggered” into a state of total hysteria over the spotting of a banana peel (seriously.)

It’s bad enough that Delton describes conservative speakers as “provocateurs” — without assigning a similar description to Left-wing bomb-throwers like Barack Obama, Michael Moore, Bill Maher and Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., just to name a few.

But then she justifies her call for a campus speech ban by comparing conservative speakers to the American communist movement of the early-to-mid 20th century:

Most famously, liberal activist Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. argued that communists hid behind the First Amendment to attack liberal democracy, using it as a shield as they sought to destroy the democratic system that upheld those rights.

Schlesinger understood there weren’t enough communists in the United States to actually foment revolution. But there were enough to divide progressive forces and thus create an opportunity for conservative Republicans to take power and repeal the New Deal, which he believed would in turn destabilize American capitalism and possibly tilt the balance of international power to the Soviets. Liberals would be chumps to let a principled commitment to “freedom of speech” undercut the pragmatic goal of political survival, which was the only way to ensure progress in civil rights and social welfare.

What hubris. What arrogance.

First of all it should be known that without Republicans, there would not have been successful civil rights legislation in the 1960s. Democrats were also not unified in passing civil rights legislation — which is understandable if you know of their party’s historical alliance with, and allegiance to, the Ku Klux Klan.

But I digress. Delton’s purposeful mischaracterization of conservative political thought is typical of the far Left today. It’s adherents have assumed the power and authority to characterize their political nemeses in their terms, then use those biased descriptors to justify denying conservatives their constitutional rights — in this case to speech, assembly, and expression.

Let’s consider the highlighted portion of what Delton wrote above. She is saying that liberals aren’t really committed to constitutional principles as much as they are committed to being in power so they can make the rules and decide the social, cultural, and political makeup of the country.

A just-released poll in Virginia also provides new evidence as to how far the “progressive” Left has advanced its anti-free-speech agenda. As The National Sentinel reported, just over half of Virginians would limit free speech on college campuses in order to stop “discriminatory” speech.

“Now mind you,” The National Sentinel noted, “one person’s ‘discrimination’ is another person’s difference of opinion. Leftists have portrayed President Donald J. Trump’s travel ban from six terrorism-infested countries as a ‘discriminatory Muslim ban’ when it is nothing of the sort, for example. And his upcoming decision to reverse President Obama’s very unconstitutional DACA program is going to be considered ‘racist’ and ‘discriminatory’ by the Left when again, it’s nothing of the kind.”

Liberals are attempting to have it all: They want to pick and choose who in society is evil, then deny them their rights based on their biased mischaracterizations. We can’t let them get away with it.

This story originally appeared at NaturalNews.com.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

The Alt-Right has been repeatedly disavowed by Trump, but the violent Alt-Left has NEVER been disavowed by Democrats

(National SentinelCulture & Society: Though Democrats and their Marxist puppet masters in the establishment media are attempting to memory-hole President Donald J. Trump’s very explicit, very clear, very specific denunciations of white supremacists, the KKK and neo-Nazis in the aftermath of the recent violence in Charlottesville, Va., the same Alt-Left screaming that Trump is a ‘racist bigot’ have thus far failed to similarly call out their groups who are committing violence in the name of “freedom” and “democracy.”

As noted by Jack Prosobiec, with The Rebel Media, in a YouTube video, these facts are as obvious as they are incontrovertible — but you won’t hear the Marxist Left media reporting it or even pretending to be ‘fair and balanced’ on the issue.

And because of that, Posobiec — a Navy vet who has worked for four presidential campaigns — thinks the Democrat Left has “overreached” and will suffer even bigger defeats at the polls in the months and years ahead.

“The Alt-Left has never been disavowed by Democrats,” he said. “The Alt-Left has never been disavowed by Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama — any of them.”

That would be groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter, both of whom have been showing up for months at events featuring speakers and political figures who espouse conservative ideology. And Trump supporters especially have had to deal with these thugs, who are showing specifically to use force to intimidate and harm them.

Using force to achieve a political objective, by the way, is the textbook definition of terrorism. And since these thugs are Americans, they’re, by definition, domestic terrorists.

Yet leading Democrats have not disavowed these people and their groups — and they haven’t been forced to or shamed into doing so because the same disgustingly dishonest media attacking Trump won’t attack them.

Prosobiec predicted in his video that Obama will soon begin giving speeches about Charlottesville in which he will portray the Alt-Left groups that showed up there armed and ready to do battle as being noble defenders of democracy and opponents of “hate.”

In fact, those groups are already being deified by Marxist Democrats — and some #nevertrump Republicans who see it as just another opportunity to bash a president they don’t like (because they were unable to keep him out of their party and out of the White House).

Prosobiec said he also believes the Deep State is assisting Obama in running a ‘shadow government’ — the same Deep State, he says, that revoked his security clearance some time ago, but continued to allow Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice to have them, despite the fact that both violated national security statutes.

Democrats “are completely overreaching,” he said. “They are burning statues of Abraham Lincoln. They’re tearing down…statues all over the place. When it comes down to it, the meme in all of this will be the violence of the Alt-Left.”

One recent article even suggested that the Alt-Left was becoming “the Democrats’ Tea Party” — and “it must be stopped.” Except that the Republicans’ Tea Party wing was never violent and did not show up to liberal speaking or political events armed with clubs for the express purpose of beating on liberal supporters. (Related: Alt-Left leader vows to ‘crush skulls’ at Conservative prayer rally with nail-embedded bat.)

And, according to VidMax:

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights was quick to condemn the white supremacists involved in the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, but they voted down a proposal to also condemn violence from the the far-left group Antifa. 

In a vote to include Antifa in the official commission statement, four Democratic commissioners voted “no.” The Republican who proposed it, Gail Heriot, and the Republican who seconded the proposal, Peter Kirsanow, were the only two who voted “yes.” 

Translation: Left-wing Democrats will always condone violence that is directed at conservatives and Republicans, which makes them part of the country’s largest hate group.

This story originally appeared at NewsTarget.com.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

House conservatives planning reboot of Obamacare repeal and replace — and it just might work

(National SentinelBig Government: One of the main reasons why voters gave Republicans control of the House, Senate and White House was their promise to repeal and replace the disastrous Affordable Care Act, also known derisively as “Obamacare.”

But six months into President Donald J. Trump’s first term, the GOP has failed miserably to deliver on its promise.

Some believe that too many Republican establishment types just don’t want to see Trump — who made repeal-and-replace a cornerstone of his campaign — succeed, so they’re withholding support for repealing a law they all voted in unison to replace just a few years ago.

Other political commentators have observed that deep down, a number of Republicans share the same view held by their Democratic colleagues who gave us Obamacare in the first place: That the federal government ought to control all our healthcare, and hence our personal behavior, because they’re really closet authoritarians deep down.

Still, others think that a number of Republicans are just political cowards who, when given the opportunity to do the bold thing and actually follow through on a campaign promise don’t have the guts to do so.

Either way, there is a growing group of House conservatives who not only believe repeal and replace is still possible, but that it should be done and can be done.

One of them is Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who told The Daily Signal it was time to “put the screws” to GOP lawmakers who have been promising to get rid of the most destruct public health policy in the history of our country.

“We certainly can’t give up,” he said.

The website noted further:

Gaetz was explaining why he decided to back a small caucus of House conservatives in its strategy to force a floor vote on a bill mirroring the Obamacare repeal passed in December 2015.

The House Freedom Caucus announced Friday its plan to collect the 218 signatures required on a “discharge petition” to pull that legislation out of committee.

Gaetz told The Daily Signal how he stands on that strategy.

“I signed the discharge petition because the things we have done so far to appease moderates in our party haven’t worked,” Gaetz, who is not a Freedom Caucus member, said. “So, maybe we should take a conservative approach going forward. We certainly can’t give up.”

In 2015 bill passed the GOP-controlled House and Senate in 2015 but, naturally, was vetoed by President Obama. The bill contained language repealing several key aspects of the ACA, including the expansion of Medicaid to Americans who really make enough money they don’t need a subsidy, and nearly all of the law’s tax increases.

In addition, the legislation called for abolishing Obamacare’s insurance mandates for both employers and individuals — requiring them to offer and carry health insurance, respectively — and for the defunding of Planned Parenthood, an abortion-providing organization that rakes in $500 million in taxpayer funding annually, forcing tens of millions of taxpayers to support an organization they don’t agree with.

But because all House and Senate Republicans voted in 2015 to repeal Obamacare, Gaetz says there’s no reason for them not to do so today, when they know that Trump would sign the bill into law.

“There is this theory both in the House and in the Senate that the legislation that everyone has previously voted for to repeal Obamacare would not get the votes on the floor of either body,” he told The Daily Signal. “It’s my view that the ‘I was for it before I was against it’ political narrative has proven to be unsuccessful. And so I want to put the screws to the members of my party who seem to only want to support repealing Obamacare when they don’t think it will actually happen.”

Still, he acknowledged the difficulty in getting a bill to the president, but not because of his chamber. (Related: Memo from WE THE PEOPLE to Congress: Get rid of Obamacare and pass tax reform or lose your seats in 2018.)

“These days it’s reasonable to be skeptical that a Mother’s Day resolution could pass the Senate,” he said.

The good news is that there are members of Congress still dedicated to getting rid of a health care law Democrats and President Obama lied repeatedly to pass in the first place.

This story originally appeared at Trump.news.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Google whistleblowers: Search engine penalizing all sites that don’t conform to political correctness

(National SentinelCensorship: Tech and media behemoth Google is continuing to flex its considerable muscle by controlling more of what you are ‘allowed’ to see. And it’s being based entirely on political ideology.

As reported by Breitbart News, company whistleblowers are now coming out of the woodworkto spill the beans on the tech giant’s growing bias against conservative thought and opinion after Google fired engineer James Damore for daring to challenge the company’s predominant Left-wing bias in a 10-page memo, where he defended diversity of viewpoints and offered a fact-based defense of gender gaps for certain fields.

As Breitbart noted, more Google employees are speaking out in support of Damore’s manifesto, but they are having to do so anonymously because ‘diversity-seeking’ Google really doesn’t want diversity of thought or opinion, just authoritarian compliance with Alt-Left orthodoxy:

Damore’s ten-page manifesto, which was met by an immediate backlash, described a climate of fear, in which employees who challenge prevailing leftist narratives at the company are faced with immediate threats to their career. Damore’s own experience appears to confirm this.

In response, the site is publishing exclusive interviews under the series title “Rebels of Google,” featuring employees of the tech giant who have reached out to confirm much of what Damore wrote.

In the first interview of the series, one employee named “Hal” talked about how Google mid- and upper-level managers conduct “witch hunts” and practice ideological intolerance against conservatives. Hal also discussed dysfunction at the company’s upper management echelons. (Related: Google redefines ‘fascism’ to smear conservatives.)

In a follow-up, an ex-Google engineer using the alias “Emmett” — who worked at the company for several years — was asked about allegations that employees within the company’s Ad Sales department had “a great deal of sympathy” with Google’s Sleeping Giants campaign, which reportedly denies ad revenue to independent and alternative media like Breitbart News and The Rebel Media.

According to one anonymous source, some Google employees in Ad Sales are “openly encouraging Adwords customers to pull their ads from Breitbart and Rebel Media.”

Emmett confirmed that claim.

“A number of friends have privately confirmed this to me,” said the whistleblower. “I know there are efforts to demote anything non-PC, anti-Communist, and anti-Islamic terror from search results. To what extent that has been successful, I don’t know.”

That said, Emmett told Breitbart he personally saw Leftists within the company program bias into YouTube’s algorithms so that anti-PC content would be pushed off the platform’s “related videos” recommendations.

“I have read internal mailing list email from SJWs [social justice warriors] absolutely incensed that there’d be, say, a Sargon of Akkad video appearing as a video related to one of their favorite SJW vloggers. This is what happens when you have unbiased algorithms, which at the time, was true. I don’t have to tell you that, in that e-mail, the SJW was quite literally asking that the ‘related videos’ function be perverted so that such a thing would stop happening,” Emmett said.

What’s more, the former engineer said, ordinary users of Google and related servers won’t even notice that there is censorship taking place.

“The software could just astroturf your ‘Related Videos’ section, and you would be none the wiser,” he said. “Sure, if you know what to look for, perhaps you’d notice. But the vast majority of the viewership would never know. That’s the whole point of such a disinformation program, right? If you can tell it’s disinformation, you would never ever believe it.”

He added it was “only a matter of time” before the company began to bias its search results against Trump supporters, Republicans and anyone who leans to the right, politically.

“I don’t have to tell you that there was an internal meltdown at Google when the election was over,” he said. “The hysteria has only ever reached a higher level once. That was throughout this weekend, thanks to the #GoogleManifesto [Damore’s screed] scandal.”

He noted that it’s even unwise to speak out against Democratic politicians at the company, let alone agree with Damore.

There are search and media alternatives to this kind of blatant censorship and ideological blackmail, including GoodGopher.com and Censored.news. Bookmark and utilize both if you want your news and information unfiltered.

This story originally appeared at NewsTarget.com.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

We don’t have national reciprocity for concealed carry because of (wait for it) Paul Ryan

(National SentinelGuns controlled: Throughout Donald J. Trump’s campaign, a number of Republicans balked at supporting his bid for the GOP nomination, claiming that he wasn’t really “a conservative.”

Well, we’d like to know how these same folks would describe today’s Republican leadership in Congress, because on a core issue — gun rights — the GOP leader in the House is AWOL.

In early January Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., introduced a national reciprocity bill that would have required every state to recognize concealed carry permits issued by other states. When it was filed Jan. 3, it had 199 co-sponsors.

So this seems not only like a very popular piece of legislation, but most definitely a very popular conservative Republican piece of legislation, right?

And yet, it hasn’t gone anywhere. Why?

Well, for an answer to that you’d have to ask Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and other House GOP leaders because the measure has sat collecting dust ever since it was introduced. And now, a noted gun control group is cheering the inaction, as Breitbart News reports:

In a Thursday report, Michael Bloomberg-funded Everytown for Gun Safety took a victory lap over the fact that the Republicans control the House yet [Ryan] is not advancing national reciprocity.

Others have noted GOP inaction on the Second Amendment. Politico reported, “Republicans in Washington keep promising rollbacks of gun control laws” but “so far haven’t taken action on any on it.”

Get your outdoors on with DayOne Gear!

Breitbart noted further:

Reps. Thomas Massie (R-KY), Mo Brooks (R-AL), and Barry Loudermilk (R-KY) emerged from the June 14 Alexandria attack with a sharp focus on concealed carry and the ability to have a gun on one’s person for self-defense regardless of the state (or district) through which one is traveling. Second Amendment supporters hope Massie, Brooks, and Loudermilk can motivate Ryan to act on behalf of gun owners at a time like this; a time when Republicans control the House and Senate, and have a president who has already made clear he supports national reciprocity for concealed carry.

So with clear majorities in both chambers of Congress and ownership of the Oval Office, conservatives still can’t get national reciprocity — or Obamacare repeal, or major tax reform.

Why, exactly, do we continue to send these same, lame GOP “leaders” who have long shed any semblance of “conservatism” back to D.C.?

“New normal” violence by the insane Marxist Left prove THEY are the merchants of hate and intolerance

(National SentinelActivism: The Left-wing political establishment consisting of the Democratic Party and its sycophantic allies in the press have begun a dangerous process that will have disastrous consequences for the future of our republic: They have launched a campaign of fear, intimidation and violence against Republicans and conservatives in their bid to bring such behavior into the mainstream and turn it into the new normal.

As reported by The Daily Caller, the political environment is becoming increasingly hostile, and those on the Left are the antagonists. Consider several recent incidents as proof:

— Police in Tennessee recently arrested and charged a woman, Wendi Wright, with felony reckless endangerment for allegedly attempting to run U.S. Rep. David Kustoff, a Republican, off the road following a town hall event. Wright was outraged over the congressman’s stated support for an Obamacare replacement bill, the American Health Care Act, and screamed at him and his aide, Marianne Dunavant, eventually hitting his car windows and trying to grab them inside the vehicle.

— The same day as the incident in Tennessee, cops in North Dakota escorted an outraged man from another town hall event when he got physical with GOP Rep. Kevin Cramer, again over his support for the Republicans’ Obamacare replacement bill.

“Will the rich benefit from, if the health care is destroyed, do the rich get a tax break? Yes or no?” he shouted, using typical Left-wing Democratic talking points (which aren’t true, by the way). He then stuffed cash down Cramer’s collar shouting, “There you go, take it.” (RELATED: It’s time to start arresting, prosecuting and imprisoning the mindless, violent mobs on the left)

CNN host Poppy Harlow downplayed the physicality, reporting matter-of-factly, “This man showing his disgust with the congressman’s support of tax cuts for the wealthy, one part of the GOP plan right now.”

Unbelievable. Now, if Cramer were a Democrat there would have been media outrage.

On another note, you’ll notice that no Republican voters are showing up at Democrat town halls behaving stupidly and violently.

— In an article for the Huffington Post, Michaelangelo Signorile, the “Queer Voices Editor-at-Large,” actively called on people to harass Republican lawmakers wherever they are and wherever they go – in public and even at their homes, as if this is even remotely okay. He wrote:

Starting today and from here on, no elected official ― certainly those in the GOP defending and supporting Trump on a variety of issues, for example ― should be able to sit down for a nice, quiet lunch or dinner in a Washington, DC eatery or even in their own homes. They should be hounded by protestors everywhere, especially in public ― in restaurants, in shopping centers, in their districts, and yes, on the public property outside their homes and apartments, in Washington and back in their home states. 

White House officials too ― those enabling the authoritarian ― need to be challenged everywhere, as do all those at the conservative think tanks who support Trump and those who publicly defend him in their columns and on television.

This is an open call for harassment and violence to be committed against elected officials who, in representing actual voters, are pursuing policies and legislation that Leftists don’t agree with, pure and simple. It is no more complex than that; they feel that just because they don’t agree, they somehow have a right to criminally disrupt the lives of those who hold opposing views. And yet they claim to be on the side of tolerance and understanding. It’s hypocrisy on steroids.

— As reported by Big League Politics, a bar in Portland, OR., is actually offering whiskey for life to any patronwho punches Steve Bannon, President Donald J. Trump’s senior political strategist. The bar, called Paydirt, is printing the invitation on the bottom of its receipts.

“Imagine the outrage if someone on the right solicited violence against anyone in the Obama administration, they would immediately be branded domestic right-wing terrorists. Somehow, seemingly endless calls for violence against the Trump administration are not only acceptable among the left, it is celebrated,” the site noted. (RELATED: Berkeley Mayor Sides With The Unhinged Left-Wing Terrorists, Blaming Milo For The Violence)

Yes, just imagine.

The site also notes that it is a Class C or D felony under 18 U.S. Code to threaten public officials other than the president. Also, it’s against the law to solicit violence against public officials.

But this all just fine, see, because it’s Trump and Republicans, and since Leftists have ‘decided’ it’s alright, then it is alright.

Except that it’s not. It never has been.

Barring a law enforcement crackdown on these kinds of outrageous provocations, Republicans and conservatives will likely start pushing – and hitting – back. Count on it.

This story originally appeared at NewsTarget.com.

never-miss-story