Hannity warns: ‘Just a SLIVER’ of DEEP STATE corruption has come out so far (Video)

(National SentinelSwamp Creatures: Fox News host Sean Hannity said during his Friday night program that a crescendo of information regarding Obama-era corruption in the FBI, Justice Department and other federal agencies is coming and that only a “sliver” of information has been released thus far.

“Like we’ve been telling you, sit tight. If you think this is bad right now I promise you it’s going to only get worse,” he said.

“What we have now is a sliver of the information. It’s coming out day by day. I’ve been warning you from the beginning this is Watergate on steroids. And as you can see this gets more corrupt by the day,” the Fox News star noted.

Legacy Food Storage

Referencing the revelations contained in the House Intelligence Committee’s explosive FISA memo, Hannity reminded viewers that “this whole thing starts with Hillary Clinton, remember, rigging the [Democratic] primary against [Sen.] Bernie Sanders. Why more Bernie people aren’t mad, I don’t know.”

Continuing, Hannity said:

Then she tried to rig the general election against Donald Trump. She paid for a phony Russian propaganda dossier filled with Russian government lies and propaganda…the FBI then takes that bought-and-paid-for dossier; they don’t tell the FISA judge the truth, to go out and get a warrant to spy on the Trump campaign before the election…

There’s more, here:

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

John Fund: FISA memo proves political establishment WEAPONIZED intelligence to HIDE massive scandals

(National SentinelPoliticized Intel: John Fund, the longtime columnist for National Review, noted this week that the so-called “FISA memo” released last week by the House Intelligence Committee documents how the political establishment under President Barack Obama sought to “bury scandals and avoid accountability” through overclassification.

“Leaving aside all of the hyperbole and smokescreens surrounding the Nunes memo, one indisputable fact stands out. Many leading Democrats asserted confidently that the memo would expose national-security information and damage the ability of our intelligence agencies to function,” Fund wrote.

“The memo released Friday — which did not have a single word redacted — clearly contained lots of information on intelligence-agency abuses. Here’s what it did not contain: secrets vital to national security,” he added.

Fund went on to point out that the FBI, Justice Department and leading Democrats all issued dire warnings over the memo’s release, claiming it would compromise national security and hurt the country:

Yet, just the day before the memo was released, Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) sent a letter to House speaker Paul Ryan, (R., Wis.) warning of the damage that “dangerous partisanship” could do to the country if the memo were released. House minority leader Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) called the memo “dangerous” and “illegitimate” and declared that the House Intelligence Committee had ignored warnings from the FBI and Justice Department and was behaving with a “dangerous irresponsibility and disregard for our national security.”


The FBI issued a statement warning of “grave” consequences if the memo was released. So far, none of these players has since apologized for their misleading statements or explained why they made them.

All of this opens a broader issue: To what extent do our leaders seek to bury abuses, prevent accountability, and sweep embarrassing information under the rug by exaggerating national-security threats? To a great extent, I fear, and the ploy has become a “last refuge among scoundrels” — even more so than hyper-patriotism has become.

None of the dire predictions about harming national security have been borne out, however.

As we reported, the FISA Memo, which was released by the House Intelligence Committee, documented serial abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court involving the use of an unsubstantiated political document in order to obtain a warrant to spy on a member of the Trump campaign.

“The Nunes-memo episode should teach us that in future we should take the more hysterical claims of those who may have something to hide with a pillar of salt,” Fund wrote.

“Of course, we should scrupulously guard against unwarranted release of sensitive information,” he continued. “But we should also remember the words of Supreme Court (J)ustice Louis Brandeis who said, ‘Sunlight is the best disinfectant.’”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

DiGenova: McCABE removal from FBI just the beginning; IG report shows he made FBI agents FABRICATE evidence in HILLARY probe

(National SentinelCorrupt: Former U.S attorney Joe diGenova and his wife/partner Victoria Toensing appeared on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs Tuesday evening to discuss what appears to be a growing FBI and Justice Department scandal to protect and exonerate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over her criminal mishandling of classified emails.

Live Fire Gear - FireCord

In particular, diGenova said that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is likely in far more trouble than anyone had suspected, as will be revealed if and when the House Intelligence Committee’s “FISA memo” is released, as well as the Justice Department inspector general’s investigation into allegations that McCabe was politicized by the Obama administration.

McCabe was removed from office on Monday, the day after FBI Chief Christopher Wray visited Capitol Hill to read the House Intelligence FISA memo that was released to the president on Monday night.

“There’s going to be resolution. The memo from the House Intelligence Committee will be the start,” diGenova said.

“Next will come the inspector general’s report from the Department of Justice which will be devastating. Because it will show Andrew McCabe made FBI agents fabricate evidence to exonerate Hillary Clinton and then there’s going to be a federal grand jury to investigate the Obama administration’s senior Department of Justice officials and the senior members of the FBI,” he added.

Watch, via Lou Dobbs Tonight:

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

FBI Deputy Director McCABE RESIGNS; is the FISA memo about to implicate him?

(National SentinelDeep State: FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe has announced that he will step down from his position, fueling speculation that the so-called “FISA memo” may soon be released and may implicate him as part of a plot to spy on the Trump campaign.

As reported by NBC News:

McCabe has been at the center of ongoing tensions between the White House and the FBI and has reportedly been under pressure to quit from President Donald Trump, whose campaign is being investigated for possible collusion with Russia.

McCabe reportedly resigned on Monday. He will remain on the FBI’s payroll until he is formally able to retire, NBC News said.

In recent weeks the White House has put pressure on McCabe after he was implicated in text messages exchanged between anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, FBI lawyer Lisa Page.

The two discussed an “insurance policy” to allegedly undermine President Donald J. Trump’s campaign and, possibly, his presidency in the event he defeated Hillary Clinton.

The texts referenced discussing the insurance policy in “Andy’s office,” which is believed to be McCabe.

Also, last week administration spokesman Raj Shah referenced reports of pressure from the White House to fire McCabe by saying in a statement that Trump “believes politically motivated senior leaders” of the FBI “have tainted the agency’s reputation for unbiased pursuit of justice” and that the new director he “appointed” will “clean up the misconduct at the highest levels of the FBI.”

Some believe that McCabe may be implicated with others in the FISA memo, which allegedly details abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. There has been speculation that the FBI used the unsubstantiated — and unvetted — “Trump dossier,” which was paid for by the Clinton campaign, as a legitimate intelligence document in order to obtain a surveillance warrant to spy on the Trump campaign.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Strzok-Page texts show FBI HID details of Hillary probe from Congress; knew they would be revealed in FOIA requests and ‘inflame Congress’ (Video)

(National SentinelNOversight: Presidential attorney Jay Sekulow on Friday discussed newly-released texts between FBI officials Peter Strzok and his mistress Lisa Page, saying the two knew they were stonewalling lawmakers regarding the Hillary Clinton email investigation.

Discussing the tests on his radio program, “Jay Live,” Sekulow also said the texts revealed that the two understood the hidden FBI reports would eventually be revealed in Freedom of Information Act requests and “absolutely inflame Congress.”

The two anti-Trump officials admitted to hiding “302 reports” — which are summaries of interviews conducted with witnesses and/or suspects — from lawmakers regarding Clinton’s criminal mishandling of classified emails.

Also, both then complained that FOIA requests from interested parties would eventually cause the hidden reports to be released, thus created widespread angst and condemnation in Congress.

“Peter Strzok on September 10th, 2016–this is during the heart of the election last year,” Sekulow began.

Quoting Strzok, Sekulow said, “‘Thing is, there are very inflammatory things in the 302’s’ [that’s the agents’ reports] that we didn’t turn over to Congress because they weren’t relevant to understanding the focus of the investigation.'”

“This was the investigation of Hillary Clinton-the ongoing email investigation,” Sekulow said, putting the conversation in context.

Again quoting Stzrok, Sekulow noted further, ‘These are going to come out in FOIA’s and absolutely inflame Congress…’

“In other words, once the FOIA requests come in and they are responded to, it’s going to create a firestorm,” the president’s counsel said.

Critics noted that as bad as that is, only a fraction of the total number of texts sent between Strzok and Page during a crucial five-month period have been released to Congress.


Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Grassley, Graham DEMAND info from Hillary, DNC, Donna Brazile, Podesta, RE: Fusion GPS

(National SentinelSeeking Answers: Two Republican members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, its chairman and a senior member, have sent letters to a number of key Democratic figures demanding information about their dealings with the author of the “Trump dossier,” former British spy Christopher Steele.

Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the panel’s chair, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., want answers pertaining to the committee’s investigation into allegations the FBI relied on the unsubstantiated dossier in order to improperly obtain a surveillance warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in order to spy on President Donald J. Trump’s campaign.

“As part of their ongoing oversight efforts to ensure that the FBI’s law enforcement activities are free of improper political influence, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) yesterday sent six letters seeking information and documents regarding Christopher Steele’s work on behalf of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary for America,” said a statement posted to Grassley’s Senate website.

“The letters seek information and documents relating to those political organizations’ knowledge of and involvement in Mr. Steele’s work and his reported interactions with the FBI while he was working on behalf of these political organizations,” the statement said.

Letters were sent to:

Legacy Food Storage

The letters referenced an October 2017 Washington Post story which said that the dossier was paid for, in large part, by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.

A letter from the law firm Perkins Coie acknowledged that, “[t]o assist in its representation ofthe DNC and Hillary for America, Perkins Coie engaged Fusion GPS in April of 2016” and that “the engagement concluded prior to the November 2016 Presidential election,” the letters said, referencing the story.

Earlier this month, the pair sent a criminal referral to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and FBI Director Christopher Wray asking that they investigate whether the former MI6 agent was dishonest during his interactions with federal authorities.

A report from earlier this month claimed to substantiate allegations that the FBI relied on the discredited dossier to obtain a FISA court warrant, which would be a gross misrepresentation and a possible criminal act.

“A large portion of the evidence presented in the salacious 35-page dossier put together by former British spy Christopher Steele, has either been proven wrong or remains unsubstantiated. However, the FBI gained approval nevertheless to surveil members of Trump’s campaign and ‘it’s outrageous and clearly should be thoroughly investigated,’ said a senior law enforcement source, with knowledge of the process,” investigative reporter and Fox News contributor Sara A. Carter reported.

“(The dossier) certainly played a role in obtaining the warrant,” added another senior U.S. official, with knowledge of the dossier. “Congress needs to look at the FBI officials who were handling this case and see what, if anything, was verified in the dossier. I think an important question is whether the FBI paid anything to the source for the dossier.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

There IS a DEEP STATE! Text messages reveal SECRET SOCIETY within Justice, FBI, working AGAINST TRUMP (Video)

(National SentinelBombshell: Attorney General Jeff Sessions said on Monday that disgraced FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, exchanged some 50,000 text messages, but added that figure does not include five months’ worth of ‘missing’ texts the bureau said were lost in a database glitch.

“We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source,” Sessions said in a statement provided to Fox News. “If we are successful, we will update the congressional committees immediately.”

The missing messages cover a crucial window, as the gap occurs between the presidential transition and the launch of Robert Mueller’s Russia probe — where both officials previously were assigned.

After reviewing all of those messages, Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, told Fox News he believes there is a “secret society” within the Justice Department and the FBI that worked feverishly to undermine Donald J. Trump’s candidacy and presidency.

“What we learned today in the thousands of text messages that we’ve reviewed that perhaps they may not have done that (checked their bias at the door),” he said.

“There’s certainly a factual basis to question whether or not they acted on that bias. We know about this insurance policy that was referenced in trying to prevent Donald Trump from becoming president,” he continued.

“We learned today from information that in the immediate aftermath of his election that there may have been a ‘secret society’ of folks within the Department of Justice and the FBI to include Page and Strzok to be working against him,” the Texas lawmaker said, in a bombshell.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., also reviewed the texts with Radcliffe. Watch:

Regarding the missing texts, which Gowdy and Radcliffe found incredulous, Sessions noted further: “I have spoken to the Inspector General and a review is already underway to ascertain what occurred and to determine if these records can be recovered in any other way. If any wrongdoing were to be found to have caused this gap, appropriate legal disciplinary action measures will be taken.”

“We need to get to the bottom of it and find out what exactly happened,” Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, told Fox News.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

OUTRAGE: GOP lawmakers DEMAND second special counsel after FBI ‘loses’ Peter Strzok texts

(National SentinelObamagate: Republican lawmakers are demanding that the Department of Justice appoint a second special counsel to look into how the FBI could have lost a group of texts involving disgraced counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok.

Over the weekend, The Associated Press reported that the Justice Department turned over to Congress an additional batch of text messages involving Stzrok, but that for ‘technical reasons’ could not retrieve about five months’ worth of communications.

The AP noted further:

New text messages highlighted in a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray by Sen. Ron Johnson, the Republican chairman of the Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, are from the spring and summer of 2016 and involve discussion of the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server. They reference Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s decision to accept the FBI’s conclusion in that case and a draft statement that former FBI Director James Comey had prepared in anticipation of closing out the Clinton investigation without criminal charges.

Following revelations about that so-called glitch, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, renewed his earlier call for a second special counsel to begin probing what he and other Republicans say is a mounting scandal.

“First the IRS destroyed emails pivotal to our investigation of their political targeting. Now the FBI ‘failed to preserve’ texts between Peter Strzok & Lisa Page following the ’16 election. The time for a second special counsel is now,” he tweeted.

In addition, House Freedom Caucus chairman Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., echoed Jordan’s call.

“Unreal. We’ve been asking for the remaining text messages between anti-Trump FBI agents (and former Mueller team members), Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. The FBI now says the texts are ‘missing.’ If it wasn’t already clear we need a second special counsel, it’s abundantly clear now,” he tweeted.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Gaetz: FISA Memo will PROVE that Mueller investigation is all Trump says it is – a ‘ROTTEN witch hunt’ (Video)

(National SentinelCollusion Hoax: Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz told Fox News host Tucker Carlson Friday evening during his program that the four-page FISA Memo drafted by the House Intelligence Committee contains information that he believes will prove President Donald J. Trump correct about special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia “collusion” probe.

In response to Carlson asking what they memo is such a “big deal,” Gaetz noted, “I believe that once the American people have the opportunity to evaluate the allegations and claims in this memo, it will become evident the activities of the last administration, the crimes I believe were committed, and the total sham that this Mueller investigation is, built on a false premise and rotten to the core, Tucker.”

Last week Circa News investigative reporter and Fox News contributor Sara A. Carter said sources have told her the contents of the memo are so “explosive” they could spell a quick end to Mueller’s probe of the Trump campaign and transition team.

During the same interview, Gaetz predicted that people would be fired and that some will “go to jail.”

“I believe this will not end just with firings. I believe there are people who will go to jail. I was very persuaded by the evidence,” Gaetz told Hannity.

During his interview with Carlson, the host asked why, if the memo contains evidence of lawbreaking, it is illegal for Gaetz and others who have seen its contents to discuss specifics.

Gaetz acknowledged the irony, but said the memo is classified top secret, thus prohibiting members by law from discussion specifics publicly.


Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Rep. Jim Jordan: ‘Shocking’ FISA memo context revealed proving MASSIVE corruption at ‘HIGHEST levels’ (Video)

(National SentinelObamagate: During a Friday evening appearance with Fox News‘ Martha McCallum, Ohio Republican Rep. Jim Jordan discussed the “shocking” FISA memo released to lawmakers by the House Intelligence Committee that ostensibly details massive abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by the Obama administration.

Specifically, the four-page memo reportedly proves that the Obama White House misused the FISA process to improperly obtain a surveillance warrant against members of President Donald J. Trump’s campaign and transition team under the guise of a counterintelligence operation.

Jordan, who said he’s read the memo, appeared with McCallum to discuss the context to the memo.

“I know that you are, you’re all not talking about the classified information in this four page document put together by [House Intelligence Committee Chairman] Devin Nunes [R-Calif], basically collates all of their investigation that he wanted all of you to see,” McCallum said. “You’ve read it. Do you believe that there is a crime in there committed by the DOJ and FBI or members of those entities?”

“Look, what I believe is what my colleagues have said, what I’ve said is the American people need to see this. We want the journalists in this great country to see this. Mostly, we want the American people to understand what the FBI did, how wrong it was, and again, we’re not allowed to talk about it,” Jordan said.

“The last point [Fox News correspondent] Ed [Henry] made was right on target. The committee could meet today, could meet tomorrow — if the majority of the committee votes to release this — it goes to the White House, the White House could say ‘thumbs up’ or ‘thumbs down,'” Jordan continued, alluding to the fact that Trump would have to approve the memo’s public release.

“My guess is there going to say ‘thumbs up’ and then it’s out there and the American people can see what took place at the highest levels of our FBI, at the highest levels of the Justice Department that should not happen in this great nation,” Jordan added.

McCallum said some have compared the alleged scandal to Watergate, calling it much more serious, then pressed Jordan for more specifics regarding Obama administration actions.

“Again, I can’t talk about the specifics, that’s why we’re pushing so hard make it public so we can talk about the specifics,” he responded. “But think about what we knew a long time ago.

“The Clinton campaign paid for the dossier. Think about those text messages from Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, where they talk about — remember the text messages where they talk about ‘walking through Wal-Mart, I can smell the Trump supporters’ — the derision they have for  the people who supported the president,” Jordan said.

“The anti-Trump bias, the pro-Clinton bias and then think about the text messages that talks about an insurance policy to make sure Donald Trump is not elected by the American people,” he said.

Watch (video credit Fox News):

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Rep. Gaetz over FISA warrant/dossier scandal: ‘I believe people will GO TO JAIL’ (Video)

(National SentinelEpic Scandal: During a Thursday evening appearance on Fox News‘ “Hannity” program, Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., predicted that officials within the Department of Justice and the FBI would not only be fired over alleged ties to a bogus FISA warrant obtained by the Obama administration and used to spy on the Trump campaign.

He and other Republican lawmakers are calling on the House Intelligence Committee to release a reportedly explosive but classified “FISA memo” that members who have read it say it lays out scandalous behavior on the part of the previous administration that goes well beyond Watergate.

The panel quietly voted earlier this week to release the memo to the full House. Members have already pored over the document, which they must do in a secure room due to its Top Secret classification.

On Hannity, Gaetz predicted that the memo’s contents would lead to serious consequences for all involved.

“I believe this will not end just with firings. I believe there are people who will go to jail. I was very persuaded by the evidence,” he said.

According to Fox News contributor Sara Carter, the contents of the memo are so “explosive” that it could lead to the end of special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russian collusion probe.

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, in discussing the revelations contained in the memo, added: “This should never happen in a country like America.”

He said that if a majority of the House Intelligence Committee votes to release the memo, it would then go to the White House for review. If the president gives his approval, then the memo — or parts of it — would be released to the public.

Gaetz added that the entire Mueller probe “is a fallacy” that was “built on fiction, a lie.” He noted that not a single Democrat on the Intelligence Committee voted in favor of the memo’s release.

Per Hannity, watch:

Gaetz and others have also said that there is nothing in the memo that would compromise U.S. national security.

Chris Farrell, the director of investigations for government watchdog group Judicial Watch, said the memo was grossly “over classified.” He also said he believes that “corrupt law enforcement officers” within the federal government — including former FBI Director James Comey — should be fired, at a minimum.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

They did WHAT? Mueller, McCabe and Rosenstein ALL involved in cover-up of FBI investigation into Uranium one BRIBES

(National SentinelScandal: Reports last week note that Justice Department officials in the District of Maryland announced that Mark Lambert of Mount Airy, Md., was indicted on 11 counts related to “bribery, kickbacks, and money-laundering.”

Those charges stemmed from an alleged plot to bribe Vadim Mikerinn, a Russian executive at JSC Techsnabexport, or TENEX.

As reported by Zero Hedge:

According to the indictment, Lambert and others at Transport Logistics International (TLI) engaged in several counts of bribery, kickbacks and money laundering with Russian nuclear official Vadim Mikerin, in order to secure business advantages with TENEX – a subsidiary of Rosatom, the Kremlin’s state-owned energy company which bought Uranium One.

TLI would have ostensibly transported all of the uranium from the U1 deal, were it not for an FBI undercover mole buried deep within the Russian nuclear industry who gathered extensive evidence of corruption. 

Robert Mueller’s FBI had been investigating the scheme since at least 2008 – with retiring Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe assigned to the ongoing investigation which was hidden from the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS). Had they known, the committee never would have approved the Uranium One deal with TENEX’s parent company, Rosatom. 

Four individuals were eventually prosecuted and given plea agreements after the Uranium One deal was approved. The prosecuting DOJ attorneys? Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and top Mueller investigator in the Trump-Russia probe, Andrew Weissman – who praised former acting Attorney General Sally Yates for defying Trump.

According to John Solomon at The Hill, the Obama DoJ never called the deal’s secret information, William D. Campbell, when it was time to charge former Russian uranium industry official Mikerinn.

“While he was Maryland’s chief federal prosecutor, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s office failed to interview the undercover informant in the FBI’s Russian nuclear bribery case before it filed criminal charges in the case in 2014, officials told The Hill,” reports Solomon.

As we have reported, Campbell, who was made to sign an “illegal” non-disclosure agreement (NDA) by Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claimed in November to have video evidence showing Russian agents with briefcases full of bribe money in relation to the Uranium One scandal.

Earlier, The Hill‘s John Solomon and Circa News‘ Sara Carter noted that Campbell had been deeply embedded in the Russian nuclear industry. While there he was able to gather incriminating evidence of bribery and kickbacks to and by U.S. and Russian actors involved in getting the Uranium One deal approved by the Obama administration.

Campbell, who is currently battling cancer, had earlier been misidentified as a lobbyist. In reality, he is a nuclear industry consultant.

“The Russians were compromising American contractors in the nuclear industry with kickbacks and extortion threats, all of which raised legitimate national security concerns. And none of that evidence got aired before the Obama administration made those decisions,” a person who worked on the case told The Hill, speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution by U.S. or Russian officials.

“I’ve never heard of such a case unless the victim is dead. I’ve never heard of prosecutors making a major case and not talking to the victim before you made it, especially when he was available to them through the FBI,” Alan Dershowitz told The Hill.

Last month, Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered investigators in the Justice Department to take a fresh look at the sale of Uranium One to Russian firm Rosatom.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Bill Clinton DENIES foundation funds used for Chelsea’s wedding — then Wikileaks dropped a TRUTH BOMB

(National SentinelCaught: Last week President Donald J. Trump caused a stir in the media, Hollywood and among Democrats when he allegedly called Haiti a “sh*thole country” during immigration reform negotiations with lawmakers.

The comment drew a rebuke from the Clintons — Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea, the latter of whom was then chastised via Twitter by actor James Woods.

“Mr. President, immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti and the 54 countries in Africa likely helped build your buildings. They’ve certainly helped build our country. cc @POTUS,” she tweeted.

In response, Woods accused the Clintons of using Clinton Foundation funds on daughter Chelsea’s $3 million wedding.

“Tell your dad, the bagman, to give the dough back to Haiti that you all pocketed. Then maybe we can discuss this other malarkey you’re trying to peddle,” he said.


On Saturday, the former president tweeted out a denial that any “funds” were used to pay for his daughter’s and son-in-law’s wedding.

“No Clinton Foundation funds—dedicated to Haiti or otherwise—were used to pay for Chelsea’s wedding. It’s not only untrue, it’s a personal insult to me, to Hillary, and to Chelsea and Marc,” Bill Clinton tweeted, along with a Washington Post ‘fact-checking’ article defending his claim.

However, an email released by Wikileaks from foundation official Doug Band to long-time Clinton associate John Podesta in 2012 provides clear evidence to the contrary.

“Bill Clinton claims that no Clinton Foundation ‘funds’ were used to pay for Chelsea Clinton’s wedding. However, the leaked email from then top Bill Clinton aide Doug Band doesn’t say ‘funds’ it says ‘resources,'” Wikileaks tweeted.

Here’s a graphic of the email tweeted by Wikileaks:

“The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents,” the memo said.

“I hope that you will speak to her and end this…Once we go down this road…” he added.

The former president’s tweet spurred another one from Woods, who excoriated him for it.

“The balls on this guy! You looted Haiti like a peg-legged pirate. You, your crooked wife, and your cheesy slush fund ‘foundation’ worked in concert to turn it into the sh*thole it has become,” said Woods.


Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

James Woods NAILS Chelsea Clinton after she dares to lecture POTUS Trump over HAITI

(National SentinelTwitter War: President Donald J. Trump took heat late last week from the media over comments he allegedly made about Haiti and other poor countries in discussions with lawmakers about an immigration reform bill.

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., claimed to media that Trump called Haiti a “sh*thole” and wondered aloud why the U.S. did not seek out immigrants from more successful countries.

The alleged remark earned the president a rebuke from former first daughter Chelsea Clinton.

“Mr. President, immigrants from El Salvador, Haiti and the 54 countries in Africa likely helped build your buildings. They’ve certainly helped build our country. cc @POTUS,” she tweeted.

Several credible reports have noted that money collected via the Clinton Foundation specifically for Haiti relief was misappropriated and even used to help fund Chelsea’s $3 million wedding.

That included up to $10 million that was supposed to go to build 500 homes that never got built. Documents found by government watchdog group Judicial Watch also noted that as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton essentially outsourced all U.S. aid to Haiti following a massive earthquake in 2010 to the foundation, which her husband, Bill Clinton, then directed largely to foundation donors.

Chelsea’s comments prompted a quick response from actor James Woods.

“Tell your dad, the bagman, to give the dough back to Haiti that you all pocketed. Then maybe we can discuss this other malarkey you’re trying to peddle,” he tweeted.


Many Haitians living in the U.S. have also been critical of the Clintons and the manner in which aid funds were distributed — or not, in some cases.

“The Clinton family, they are crooks, they are thieves, they are liars,” Haitian activist Dahoud Andre told the BBC in November 2016, just a few days before the presidential election.

Kim Ives, editor of Haiti Liberte newspaper, told the BBC: “A lot of Haitians are not big fans of the Clintons, that’s for sure.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Bongino: Trump-Russia dossier ‘MOST EXPLOSIVE SCANDAL’ that’s about to ‘BURST’ (Video)

(National Sentinel): Deep State: Conservative pundit and former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino said during an appearance on Fox News‘ “Outnumbered” program earlier today that the infamous “Trump dossier” scandal was about ready to “burst.”

“It’s the most explosive scandal… It’s getting ready to burst,” Bongino noted on the program.

He added that an upcoming Department of Justice Office of Inspector General report detailing corruption behind the unsubstantiated dossier in its use to justify spying on President Donald J. Trump’s campaign is set for release.

Bongino went on to note that special counsel Robert Mueller’s recent acquisition of Trump transition documents — in which thousands of privileged emails belonging to the team were obtained, some say illegally, by Mueller — is a smokescreen.

He said that Mueller’s investigators, who are conducting a probe “into the most consequential counterintelligence operation” in recent member — the Trump spying — should have obtained a search warrant for the transition documents.

When asked by Fox News host Harris Faulkner why that did’t happen, Bongino said it’s because the Russian collusion narrative “is a hoax.”

“We’re asking the wrong question here,” the former federal agent said. “The question de jure has been, ‘Was the dossier used to get a warrant on Trump?’ Wrong question. Important question, but the wrong one.”

Rather, Bongino continued, “the real question is, ‘Why get a warrant at all?’ Why was the Trump team being spied on?

“Nobody has pointed out one single predicate crime to point out why Donald Trump’s team was being spied on, not one,” he continued.


Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?