Here’s PROOF that OBAMA is PERSONALLY implicated in Trump campaign SPYING SCANDAL

(National SentinelBusted: A series of new texts between anti-Trump FBI agent Peter Strzok and his mistress, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, revealed that President Barack Obama may have been directly involved in the probe of Hillary Clinton’s misuse of classified emails.

As reported by Fox News, Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., along with the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, is releasing the texts, along with a report entitled, “The Clinton Email Scandal and the FBI’s Investigation of It.”

In a Sept. 2, 2016, text to Strzok about preparing talking points for then-FBI Director James Comey to give to President Obama, Page said it was important to do so because “potus wants to know everything we’re doing.”

“Potus” is the acronym for “president of the United States.”

That text exchange is the first evidence that Obama was likely kept in the loop as the Trump spying scandal unfolded.

Fox News reported further:

Among the newly disclosed texts, Strzok also calls Virginians who voted against then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s wife for a state Senate seat “ignorant hillbillys.” (sic)

That text came from Strzok to Page on Nov. 4, 2015, the day after Jill McCabe lost a hotly contested Virginia state Senate election. Strzok said of the result, “Disappointing, but look at the district map. Loudon is being gentrified, but it’s still largely ignorant hillbillys. Good for her for running, but curious if she’s energized or never again.”

The revelation that Obama was keeping tabs on the probe involving Clinton’s mishandling of classified emails make it more likely that he was also staying abreast of the ongoing counterintelligence operation against Trump campaign staffers.

Earlier, The National Sentinel reported that Obama had other ways to find out what was happening with his FBI and Justice Department in terms of securing surveillance warrants from the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

Not only does the attorney general — Loretta Lynch at the time — have to sign off on all FISA surveillance requests, but such requests are generally included in the President’s Daily Brief.

As the Brookings Institute noted in a policy paper arguing for the Trump administration to renew legislation reauthorizing Section 702 of the FISA Act, which clarifies warrant requirements of the Act, information gathered via FISA warrants “sometimes known as PRISM, comprises a large part of the President’s Daily Brief.” 

Also, last week Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, warned Americans to “watch for Obama’s fingerprints” all over the FISA court abuses.

“Watch closely for Barack Obama’s fingerprints,” King told Breitbart News Radio. “[Democrats and their allies] will defend Barack Obama at all costs, and they’ll defend Hillary Clinton almost at all costs unless they have to sacrifice her to protect Barack Obama.”

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

SHOCK PHOTO of Obama with anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan: NOT published by photog to SAVE future prez’s rep

(National SentinelBias: A shocking photo of a smiling then-Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., with anti-Semitic Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan taken in 2005 was purposely not published by the photographer.

The reason, Askia Muhammad told the Trice Edney News Wire, was because he did not want to harm Obama’s political future.

He says that if he had released the photo of Obama and Farrakhan at a Congressional Black Caucus meeting he believed it would have “made a difference” to Obama’s political future.

Instead, he “gave the picture up at the time and basically swore secrecy,” he said.

“But after the nomination was secured and all the way up until the inauguration; then for eight years after he was President, it was kept under cover,” Muhammad said, as noted by Talking Points Memo.

“I sort of understood what was going on,” Muhammad told TPM. “I promised and made arrangements to give the picture to Leonard Farrakhan,” the minister’s son-in-law and chief of staff.

“Realizing that I had given it up, I mean, it was sort of like a promise to keep the photograph secret,” Muhammad said.

When he was asked if he believed the photo would have made a difference in whether or not Obama’s political career would have advanced any further he said, “I insist. It absolutely would have made a difference.”

Click here to see the photo, which TPM published with the Muhammad’s permission.

Obama was regularly accused in some circles of being anti-Semitic during his presidency, for what some perceived as overly friendly relations with Islamic nations including Iran, while allowing the U.S. relationship with Israel to deteriorate.

In February Levin, on his daily radio show, blamed Obama for being an anti-Semite and the “biggest funder of terrorism the world has ever seen.”

“So, Obama is the biggest funder of terrorism the world has ever seen – $150 billion to the Islamo-nazis in Tehran. On top of that, another $1.7 billion or so in hard currency, flown into Tehran under cover of dark, for our hostages.”

Levin was responding to criticism in the media of President Donald J. Trump at the time, with some liberals describing him as anti-Semitic.

“Can someone show me anywhere at any time when Trump has demonstrated any level of anti-Semitism? It’s so absurd. It’s so absurd,” he said.

“The Democrat Party is now the party that breeds anti-Semitism. The Democrat Party is now the party that breeds Israel hate. The Democrat Party backed a man, Obama, who used the UN Security Council—They didn’t just vote; they were operating in the shadows behind the scenes. They used the UN Security Council to attack Israel’s security,” he said.

The National Sentinel‘s editor-in-chief, J. D. Heyes, said this is just another example of how the biased ‘mainstream media’ conspired to protect Obama at all costs.

“It’s no wonder the legacy media continues to be mistrusted and discounted by the American people,” he said, “and why news outlets like ours are growing.”

Even the far-Left Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks extremism, has labeled Farrakhan an anti-Semite. He has claimed that whites are a “race of devils,” declaration that “Hitler was a very great man,” labeling Judaism a “gutter religion,” among other things.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

What are your thoughts?

Congress looking into whether Obama DoJ used bogus ‘Trump dossier’ to obtain secret surveillance warrants

(National SentinelCorruption: Republicans in the House and Senate are trying to find out if the corrupt, politicized Obama Dept. of Justice took a bogus “dossier” on then-GOP presidential contender Donald J. Trump before a secret court in order to justify spying on the Trump campaign.

The Daily Caller reports that GOP leaders in both chambers want to know if the phony dossier was used as real “evidence” to obtain surveillance warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court, which meets in secret and whose proceedings are not publicized:

The FBI used the dossier to secure permission to monitor the communications of Trump associate Carter Page, based on U.S. officials briefed on the Russia investigation, CNN reported in April.

The latest inquiries began Oct. 4, when the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence subpoenaed Fusion GPS, a political opposition research firm based in Washington, D.C., to appear before the committee and turn over bank documents. The committee is also seeking all Justice Department applications before the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Court, also called the FISA court, to determine if any of the applicants rely on information from the dossier.

On Oct. 4, Senate Judiciary Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, asked FBI Director Chris Wray if his agency, well before his arrival as its head, may have improperly presented the dossier before the FISA court. At the time, FBI Director James Comey presided over the bureau and Attorney General Loretta Lynch oversaw the Justice Department.

Behind the dossier’s creation was Fusion GPS, a Democrat-aligned opposition research firm that hired ex-British spy Christopher Steele to gather data on Team Trump. The resultant 35-page dossier was full of salacious and outrageous claims, none of which have ever been substantiated.

In fact, Steele himself has said none of the data can be verified.

Politicizing the FBI, Justice Department, State Department and other federal agencies charged with federal law enforcement and intelligence-gathering to this extent is unprecedented in the modern era and is a huge scandal that, of course, the so-called “mainstream” media is ignoring because…Obama.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

It begins: Mississippi school changes name from Jefferson Davis to Barack Obama

(National SentinelCulture: The deification of Barack Hussein Obama has begun in earnest, as officials at the Jefferson Davis Magnet IB in Jackson, Mississippi, will change the name of the institution to Barack Obama Magnet IB in the 2018-2019 school year.

Why this change, and why now?

“Jefferson Davis, although infamous in his own right, would probably not be too happy about a diverse school promoting the education of the very individuals he fought to keep enslaved being named after him,” said PTA President Janelle Jefferson.

Davis’ student body is 98 percent black.

But why Obama?

Jefferson said the former president “fully represents ideals and public stances consistent with what we want our children to believe about themselves.”

Never mind that Obama’s administration is shaping up to be one of the most corrupt ever, highlighted once more with the breaking news this week that his FBI (and likely him, too) was aware of a host of illegality surrounding the Clintons and Russian operatives over the sale of one-fifth of all strategic U.S.-held uranium to a Russian state nuclear company.

As for the Davis Magnet IB school, it’s got bigger concerns than changing its name to a corrupt president.

An 18-month investigative audit has revealed that Jackson Public Schools, the second-largest district in the state, failed to meet 24 out of 32 accreditation standards.

As a result, the Mississippi Board of Education requested that the district be declared to be in a state of emergency.

But hey, maybe this is just karma: A failing school taking the name of a failed, corrupt president. Sounds about right.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Michelle Obama continues to play the race card in her quest to trash the GOP

(National SentinelRace Baiter: Frankly, we’ve never seen two people who were more focused on a person’s skin color than Barack and Michelle Obama.

From his first days in the Oval Office, the former president made race an issue when he criticized a white police officer for arresting a black Harvard professor — one of Barack’s former professors and a friend, Henry Louis Gates — because the cop had gotten a call that someone was attempting to break into a home. “The police acted stupidly,” Obama famously said — even before he had all of the information regarding the incident.

It only got worse from there. Every high-profile incident involving encounters between black men and police officers was scrutinized and criticized by the former president.

The former first lady’s race-baiting is infamous as well. After Democrats began to coalesce around her husband’s first campaign for the White House in February 2008, she said, “People in this country are ready for change and hungry for a different kind of politics and … for the first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.”

And her racism has only gotten more pronounced since then. To wit: Tuesday at the Pennsylvania Conference for Women, former first lady Michelle Obama said when she attended the State of the Union address she would notice the Republican side was “all men, all white,” and that was why she argued many people of color “don’t trust politics,” Breitbart News reported.

She explained, “At the State of the Union address … when you are in the room what you can see is this real dichotomy. It’s a feeling of color almost. On one side of the room is literally gray and white. Literally, that is the color palette on one side of the room. On the other side of the room, there are yellows and blues and whites and greens. Physically, there’s a difference in color, in the tone, because on one side all men, all white, on the other side some woman, some people of color.”

We guess the former first lady doesn’t see all the Republican women in Congress — including Utah Rep. Mia Love, who is black. Or Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, who is black. Or Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who is Latino. And on and on.

We’re guessing that the former first lady has forgotten that the Republican presidential field in 2016 was about as diverse as America and included a black physician, a female former CEO, Rubio, and another American of Latino descent, Sen. Ted Cruz. The Democrats, meanwhile, fielded three white people, two of whom are senior citizens.

As for why the GOP isn’t more diverse, perhaps it’s because of people like the Obamas, who continually divide the country along racial and ethnic lines in their bid to trash conservatives, constitutionalists, and Republicans of any moderation.

Barack and Michelle Obama are a huge part of the problem racial tensions have only worsened since they burst onto the national scene. They are not part of the solution and furthermore, they aren’t trying to be. It’s time we all understood that.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

GOP ‘life raft’ to Trump on DACA?

(National SentinelImmigration Reform: President Donald J. Trump has long struggled with what to do about former President Barack Obama’s unconstitutional “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” program, or DACA, otherwise known as “Dreamers” — keep the program in place, which would violate a campaign pledge, or end it, which would violate his conscience.

On Thursday reports surfaced that the president had decided to fulfill his campaign promise to end a program that even Obama said repeatedly he had no authority to implement. Those reports, which we covered, said Trump would make the announcement sometime Friday.

Now, a group of conservatives in the House is attempting to throw Trump a legislative life raft: They are set to introduce a bill that would allow the president to have it both ways — get rid of DACA while fulfilling his pledge to about 800,000 dreamers that he would “work something out.”

As reported by McClatchy D.C.:

Conservative lawmakers led by Thom Tillis are crafting a bill they call the conservative Dream Act that would provide a path to permanent residency to people brought here illegally as children, offering President Donald Trump an escape hatch on one of his most vexing immigration challenges.

The legislation creates an avenue for Trump to both fulfill a campaign promise to end an Obama-era program known as DACA while yielding to what appears to be his personal desire to let these immigrants remain in the country.

“Who cares about DACA if there’s a Dream Act,” said a Republican involved with the policy negotiations and aware of Tillis’ plan.

Previous reports noted that while Trump is planning to end DACA, he would still allow those already in the country on work permits to keep them until they expire. This new bill, however, gives him the political victory of keeping a campaign pledge while also allowing a more humanitarian solution for young people brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents:

The proposal would grant high school graduates without a serious criminal record conditional immigration status for a five-year period. During that time, if they earn a higher-education degree, serve in the military or stay employed, they could apply for permanent residency and, eventually, citizenship.

red-alert-FO-160x600About 2.5 million Dreamers would be eligible.

“It really is the conservative dreamer bill,” said a congressional source familiar with the plan.

Daniel Keylin, a spokesman for Tillis, confirmed that the North Carolina senator is working with Republican colleagues on “fair, but rigorous” legislation that will address “the long-term uncertainty facing undocumented minors.”

“Regardless of the policy itself, DACA is an executive overreach that sets immigration policy through executive order instead of the proper channel – Congress,” Keylin said. “It’s highly unlikely that DACA will survive a legal challenge, and it’s the responsibility of Congress, not the President, to offer a long-term legislative fix.”

Presidents have to make tough decisions, and it’s clear this one was anything but easy for the president. Tillis’ legislation, however, fixes the problem for almost everyone one involved and gives Trump an opportunity for a legislative and policy victory that is humane.

Obama should have never implemented DACA in the first place because as Keylin said, presidents don’t make laws, they implement them. That said, the parents of these Dreamer children bear the most responsibility.

That said, the parents of these Dreamer children bear the most responsibility.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Circa News’ Sara Carter wonders why Congress isn’t investigating Obama’s unprecedented political espionage

(National SentinelPolitical Abuse: Without question, former President Barack Obama heavily politicized the Justice Department, the federal courts and the nation’s intelligence apparatus, unleashing Left-wing sycophants on opponents throughout his tenure.

read-here-first-FO-160x600In the final year of his presidency, he turned the full weight of these weaponized agencies against the campaign of then-GOP nominee Donald J. Trump, as has been well-documented.

However, the only one under serious investigation for alleged political chicanery is the Trump administration, and Circa News‘ Sara Carter — who has done yeoman’s work documenting Obama’s political abuses — wonders why his former administration is not under Congress’ microscope.

In an interview with The Daily Caller, Carter said she believes Congress needs to launch an investigation into Obama-era unmasking and warrantless surveillance of Americans — which was unprecedented.

The site reported:

She was one of the first reporters to reveal Obama administration political espionage, and unprecedented unmasking and surveillance of Americans by using the national security apparatus. The Obama administration loosened the privacy protections for innocent Americans in 2011 – including accessing information from priests, attorney/client relationships, and doctors, she said.

The administration scoured Americans’ private conversations “at an exponential rate,” she said. From 2011 to January 2017, the unmasking increased over 300 percent. She also revealed the Obama administration was accessing emails at a rate of one out of every 20 Americans, an incredible 5 percent of citizens.

With reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) reauthorization before Congress, Carter believes Congress needs a full investigation into the unmasking that she has revealed.

She believes Congress should subpoena Obama officials Susan Rice, Samantha Power and John Brennan as well as understand who was unmasked, why and what they were looking for, as she does not think it was national security-related.

Carter, whose “beat” is national security, said she hasn’t seen an iota of evidence — no “fire” — implicating Trump campaign “collusion” with Russia to “steal the election” from Hillary Clinton. She did say that because of Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya in June 2016, after she promised Russian government-supplied dirt on Clinton, indicated there was at least some “smoke” surrounding the allegations.

And she also dropped this: There is “evidence of money changing hands with Hillary Clinton’s team and the Russians,” via the Clinton Foundation. She also said she believes that investigation is ongoing.

The Daily Caller:

Carter also revealed in this video interview what she is hearing from within the FBI about the politicized Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, who has long standing animus against Michael Flynn and others.

Carter told TheDCNF during the interview the concern about many insiders who are working against Trump’s policies and plans, some of whom supported Hillary Clinton or Obama. Some Trump officials, surprisingly enough, are even boasting publicly of thwarting Trump’s agenda.

Advertising disclaimer: Click here

Did Loretta Lynch set herself up to fall over the CLINTON email scandal?

(National SentinelCorruption: Long-time Washington watchers have seen Bill and Hillary Clinton slither away from scandal after scandal ever since they hit town more than two decades ago. And now it looks as though someone else may actually take the fall for Hillary’s gross criminal misconduct involving her improper use of a private email server while serving as Obama’s secretary of state.

That person? Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch.

As reported by Paul Sperry at the New York Post, Lynch may be in legal hot water over “holes” in testimony she provided the House Judiciary Committee last year. While many of her statements were incredulous at best, one in particular has caught the attention of Senate investigators looking into potential obstruction of justice, on behalf of an investigation launched by the Senate Judiciary Committee. And it could land her in legal jeopardy.

Sperry reported:

When former Attorney General Loretta Lynch testified last year about her decision not to prosecute Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information, she swore she never talked to “anyone” on the Clinton campaign. That categorical denial, though made in response to a series of questions about whether she spoke with Clintonworld about remaining attorney general if Hillary won the election, could come back to haunt her.

Among other things, [senators] want to know if she or any of her Justice Department staff “ever communicated with Amanda Renteria,” who headed Clinton’s political operations during the campaign. Renteria, who has been identified in the document as the senior Clinton campaign aide with whom Lynch privately communicated, has also been asked to testify.

The committee also wants to know if Lynch or any of her aides were in contact with former DNC chief Debbie Wasserman Schultz regarding the Clinton email investigation, according to a three-page list of questions that Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking Democrat Dianne Feinstein recently sent to Lynch at her New York apartment.

When she testified before the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. David Trott, R-Mich., laid into Lynch for refusing to recuse herself from the Clinton investigation though she met privately with Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac in Arizona, just a week before she ultimately let Hillary off the hook for criminal mishandling of classified information via her unsecured server, as then-FBI Director James Comey laid out.

Then, in reference to rumors she may possibly remain as attorney general in a hypothetical Hillary Clinton administration, Trott asked Lynch if she had met with anyone on Clinton’s campaign staff during the yearlong investigation into her email server; she replied: “I have not spoken to anyone on either the campaign or transition or any staff members affiliated with them.”

Opps.

The Senate Judiciary Committee now knows about a document that was obtained by the FBI, which reportedly shows a Democratic operative’s claim that Lynch in private assured Renteria that her Justice Department “would not push too deeply” into Clinton’s email server investigation, though the server was found to have contained highly classified information from the State Department.

“And it will press her to explain the discrepancy — along with why she reportedly asked former FBI Director James Comey to leave her office when he confronted her with the document,” Sperry wrote, offering this next:

There are three explanations: Either Lynch lied under oath, or she never in fact talked to Renteria, or her categorical denial was meant to later claim she was merely discussing her role post-election.

The committee also plans to double down into why Lynch met Bill Clinton in Arizona.

Is it possible that, after all of the hullabaloo over Clinton’s email server, which Obama knew about and used, Lynch is the one administration official who will go down for it?

Only in Washington. And only when the real criminal is named Clinton.